Critical Digital Diplomacy as a Global Challenge
The South Korean Experience
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7540341 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jan Melissen (0000-0002-1312-0808, Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael, corresponding author), Emillie De Keulenaar (0000-0001-7428-0461, University of Amsterdam), Emillie V de Keulenaar (University of Amsterdam) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 294-302 |
| Publication date | 2017-04-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1758-5880 • E-ISSN: 1758-5899 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1758-5899.12425 |
| OpenAlex | W2608740054 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 30 |
An important debate on the impact of digitization on diplomatic practice is currently taking place in most of the world's diplomatic services and beyond. Western perspectives do however dominate writings on the subject and there is scope for importing new theoretical notions into these discussions. This article on digital diplomacy aims to show that South Korea's practices harmonize well with insights from new media theory, and that both inform this debate. New media theory advocates the examination of the new digital environment in which diplomatic interactions are unfolding, and it articulates the politics behind digital technology. We argue that existing, ‘analogue’ diplomacy is not merely superimposed onto technologies now shaping an environment that is facilitating digitally native practices. The debate on digital diplomacy can equally benefit from analysis of the experiences of South Korea. Technological development and innovation impact on the sphere of foreign policy, to the extent that ‘becoming technological’ has turned into an important Korean export asset. We briefly review four ways in which South Korea applied technology to diplomacy. Our analysis concludes with general recommendations for diplomatic practitioners across the world, particularly those who still look at new technologies, including social media, as mere open and freely available ‘services
Digitization · Diplomacy · Foreign policy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Scope (computer science · Sociology · Subject (documents · Telecommunications · Asian Culture and Media Studies · Computer Science · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Engineering · Law · Satellite Communication Systems
Diversities and Developments in Asia Pacific Digital Diplomacy
Diplomatic webs
A new methodological quest to evaluate South Korean digital diplomacy in US government web domains
Sosyal Medya ve Kamu Diplomasisi
Redes tecnológicas globales
Unveiling China's digital diplomacy
Organizational culture and public diplomacy in the digital sphere
Mapping the Scholarly Landscape on AI and Diplomacy
Introduction
The Evolution of the Concept of Public Diplomacy from the Perspective of Communication Stakeholders
Two Koreas
‘Let’s Get Them Involved’ . . . to Some Extent
Media After Software
Critical Theory and the Digital
The Politics Of Democratization In Korea
A Companion to New Media Dynamics
Code/Space
‘Hypernudge’
Engineering the public
The Language of New Media
Digital diplomacy” and the securing of nationals in a citizen-centric world
The Friendship Assemblage
Protocol, Control, and Networks
Media Use and Participatory Democracy in South Korea
The making of neo-Confucian cyberkids
Conflicts of interest and incentives to bias
Trends in online networking among South Korean politicians — A mixed-method approach
Mapping online social networks of Korean politicians
Cultural Techniques
South Korea in 2005
Governing the geocoded world
Data critique and analytical opportunities for very large Facebook Pages
Contemporary cultural diplomacy in South Korea
Relocating the mobile
Poverty, Inequality, and Democracy
Social Capital and Democratic Citizenship
The Platformization of the Web
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |