The Clash of Soft Powers Between China and Japan
Synergy and Dilemmas at the Six-Party Talks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7540709 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Geun Lee (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 113-139 |
| Publication date | 2010-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asian perspective (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0258-9184 • E-ISSN: 2288-2871 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/apr.2010.0025 |
| OpenAlex | W2912554456 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 9 |
This article argues that during the Six-Party Talks on North Korea, China adroitly used its diplomacy to produce "soft-power synergy" while Japan became stuck with a "soft-power dilemma." Soft-power synergy refers to an outcome within which a success of an outward (foreign) soft-power strategy brings about simultaneous success of inward (domestic) soft-power strategy. On the other hand, soft-power dilemma denotes an outcome where a success of outward (or inward) soft-power strategy produces failure or negative influences in the inward (or outward) soft-power strategy. Borrowing from Robert Putnam's two-level game metaphor, this article tries to reveal the two-level dynamics of soft power by developing a refined conceptual framework of soft power and also by explicating a case study of Chinese and Japanese diplomacy at the Six-Party Talks
China · Dilemma · Diplomacy · Economics · Epistemology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Soft power · Asian Culture and Media Studies · Chinese history and philosophy · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Law · Philosophy
Bound to lead
A theory of soft power and Korea's soft power strategy
Singaporean foreign policy and the Asian Values Debate, 1992–2000
China's Prudent Cultivation of ''Soft'' Power and Implications for U.S. Policy in East Asia
China's Soft Power
Transformational Leadership and U.S. Grand Strategy
American Power in the 21st Century
Diplomacy and domestic politics
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,23 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2025 (13) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |