Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

(Un)thinking Citizenship

Feminist debates in contemporary South Africa, edited by Amanda Gouws

Bibliographic Data

ID7557687
AuthorsDenise M Walsh (0000-0002-5624-0615, University of Virginia, corresponding author), Denise Walsh
Year2007
Volume106
Issue424
Pages537-539
Publication date2007-07-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAfrican Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0001-9909 • E-ISSN: 1468-2621
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/afraf/adm034
OpenAlexW2078404724
LanguageEN
Citations received1

What does it mean to be a citizen in a society whose constitution promises an impressive array of rights, yet where the lived reality is one of pervasive violence, fear, poverty and HIV/AIDS? The diverse array of practitioner and activist authors in this collection are insistent that it means liberal citizenship is insufficient. In the opening essay, Linzi Manicom argues that neither substantive rights nor women-as-citizens directly undermine gender or its effects. Alternatively, she suggests feminists not only examine how ‘women’ are discursively constituted as political subjects, but also decipher the political impact of such constructions. Manicom identifies three discourses of gendered citizenship in South Africa—de-gendered individual rights-bearing subjects, women-as-citizen and mother-citizens of the nation. She warns feminists to be attentive to ways in which articulation(s) of citizenship—even those that embrace equal rights—can be essentializing and can be mobilized to promote elite interests, re-inscribing existing divisions among women. Shireen Hassim's contribution analyses how citizenship trumped nationalist discourses to become a dominant political ideal during the South African transition to democracy. She provides the historical backdrop to Manicom's contemporary critique, reminding us that ‘women-as-citizen’ was constructed by a wide range of South African women who were divided not only by race and class, but also by political ideology. As a result, they built their discursive framework on a thin notion of sisterhood: exclusion from the transition negotiations.

Citizenship · Democracy · Ideology · Nationalism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues · Gender Studies · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · South African History and Culture

  • In bodies and homes

    Open Access•Sophie Oldfield, Netsai Sarah Mathsaka et al.•Urbani izziv•2019

Citations per year0.14
Citation span2019 - 2019 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae