Ties of Solidarity and the Political Spectrum
Partisan Cleavages in Reported Solidarity Activity Across Europe
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7571053 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Johannes M Kie (0000-0002-3350-7399, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany, corresponding author), Hans-Jörg Trenz (University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark), Hans‐jörg Trenz (0000-0002-3479-7498, University of Copenhagen) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 459-474 |
| Publication date | 2019-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002764218823839 |
| OpenAlex | W2912222194 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 29 |
The strength of solidarity ties among individuals is often discussed in relation to membership within a community of equals. This assumes strong links between reported solidarity actions, political attitudes, and national identity. We ask, first, whether differences in solidarity engagement can be explained by party affiliation: Do adherents of political parties driven by right-identitarian politics and adherents of parties driven by left-redistributive politics differ considerably in terms of reported solidarity action? Second, we investigate whether such differences can be explained by the nationality of the supported groups, and third, we explore whether there is a salience of reported solidarity action and party affiliation across European countries. We examine these questions by looking at cleavages in reported solidarity action in support of three different target groups: unemployed, disabled persons, and refugees. Our findings indicate first of all that partisan affiliation matters: cleavages in solidarity behavior follow traditional ideological patterns. Second, and contrary to the exclusive-communitarian rhetoric that is found in party programs and statements of right-wing populist parties, their adherents are among those supporting both nationals and foreigners least, while adherents of left and radical left parties engage in support toward nationals and non-nationals. Third, from a comparative European perspective, we observe similar patterns of a divide between an inclusive, solidary, and cosmopolitan left and a non-solidary right with low interests in community commitment
Collective action · Ideology · Immigration · Nationality · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Solidarity · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Political Conflict in Western Europe
Parties Without Partisans
The Populist Radical Right
Die enthemmte Mitte
Solidarity in Europe
Solidarity Activism in Germany
Varieties of Right-Wing Extremism in Europe
Solidarity in diverse societies
Introduction to the special issue
A Typology of Ideological Attitudes Towards Social Solidarity and Social Control
Migration and welfare state solidarity in Western Europe
Belonging and the politics of belonging
Voice and Equality
Winners and losers of globalization in Europe
Immigration, Europe and the ‘new’ cultural dimension
Strategic Eurosceptics and polite xenophobes
What Is Populism
Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public
The politicization of world politics and its effects
Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations
Social Transnationalism
Cosmopolitan attitudes through transnational social practices
Beyond SES
Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements
Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies
Distributive Justice and Attitudes Toward the Welfare State
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |