A Look to the Interior
Trends in U.S. Immigration Removals by Criminal Conviction Type, Gender, and Region of Origin, Fiscal Years 2003-2015
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7571234 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Margot Moinester (0000-0002-2734-1863, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 1276-1298 |
| Publication date | 2019-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002764219835276 |
| OpenAlex | W2924990042 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 9 |
Over the past two decades, the U.S. federal government has sought to increase its capacity to find, apprehend, and deport noncitizens residing in the United States who have violated federal immigration laws. One way the federal government has done this is by partnering with state and local law enforcement agencies on immigration enforcement efforts. The present study analyzes the records of all 1,964,756 interior removals between fiscal years 2003 and 2015 to examine how, if at all, the types of criminal convictions leading to removal from the U.S. interior have changed during this period of heightened coordination between law enforcement agencies and whether there are differences by gender and region of origin in the types of convictions leading to removal. Findings show that as coordination between law enforcement agencies intensified, the proportion of individuals removed from the U.S. interior with either no criminal convictions or with a driving-related conviction as their most serious conviction increased. Findings also show that the proportion of individuals removed with no criminal convictions was greater for women than for men and that the share of individuals removed with a driving-related conviction as their most serious conviction was greater for Latin Americans than for individuals from all other regions. Given renewed investment in these types of law enforcement partnerships under the Trump administration, the patterns presented in this article may foreshadow trends to come
Conviction · Criminal Conviction · Criminal law · Criminology · Enforcement · Federal law · Government (linguistics) · Immigration · Immigration law · Law enforcement · Political science · Sociology · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Punishing Immigrants
Nativity Penalty and Legal Status Paradox
Latinos’ deportation fears by citizenship and legal status, 2007 to 2018
Micro-level Interactions and Health Stratification
The effects of immigration enforcement on traffic stops
Legibility and Burden
Resisting Enforcement
No Justice, No Peace
Theorizing Legitimacy in Migration Research
Extending Driver's Licenses to Undocumented Immigrants
Exploring Immigration Detention at the Intersection of Federal Grant Funding, Sanctuary, and Political Majorities in 2015
The Control Boom
Quantitative Data Availability and Measurement of US Immigrant and Immigration Policies
The Last Best Place?
Protect, Serve, and Deport
Deporting the American Dream
Beyond the Border and Into the Heartland
The “Local” Migration State
Detention, deportation, devolution and immigrant incapacitation in the US, post 9/11
Latino immigrants perceptions of crime and police authorities in the United States
Latino immigrants' perceptions of crime and police authorities in the United States
| Citations per year | 2.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |