Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Attitudinal and Emotional Reactions to the Insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021

Bibliographic Data

ID7571305
AuthorsJennifer Anderson (0000-0002-0713-6897, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA, corresponding author), Kathryn D Coduto (0000-0003-3661-2781, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA)
Year2024
Volume68
Issue7
Pages913-931
Publication date2024-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00027642221132796
OpenAlexW4308141215
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited23

This article reports on two online surveys concerning reactions to the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. Study 1 occurred between January 8 and 11, 2021; Study 2 took place between July 8 and 15, 2021. In both studies, both Trump and Biden voters reported negative attitudes toward the rioters, but those attitudes became significantly more positive from Study 1 to Study 2 in both groups. As expected, in both studies, Trump/Pence voters had less confidence in, and satisfaction with, the election results, which correlated with more positive attitudes toward the rioters and the president. Biden/Harris voters held more positive beliefs about the election, which correlated with more negative attitudes toward the rioters and the president. In both studies, Biden voters were more likely to report feeling fear, disgust, anger, and sadness than Trump voters, who were more likely to report feeling joy and surprise. Unexpectedly, across all voters and within voting groups, more people in Study 2 reported feeling each emotion, compared with Study 1

Anger · Disgust · Feeling · Political science · Politics · Sadness · Surprise · Voting · Law · Media Influence and Health · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Affective Experiences of U.S. School Personnel in the Sociopolitical Context of 2021

    Open Access•Miranda Wood, Cheyeon Ha et al.•Education Sciences•2024

  • Racial Differences in Public Support for Federal Law Enforcement Finding and Prosecuting the January 6th Insurrectionists Who Broke Into the U.S. Capitol

    Open Access•Alexander H Updegrove, Jared R Dmello et al.•Crime & Delinquency•2025

  • Parties, Race, and Political Violence

    Open Access•Sarah Pérez, Natasha Altema Mcneely•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2025

  • The Insurrectionist Playbook

    Open Access•M Bastos, Raquel Recuero•Social Media + Society•2023

  • Perception and Mobilization of “Truth”

    Open Access•Lindsay H Hoffman, William R Leslie et al.•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Views on Men Behaving Badly

    Open Access•Crystal Robertson, Alexandria J Davis et al.•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2025

  • Rethinking Tarde’s model in the social media era and digital news

    Open Access•Cleves Nkie Mongo•European Journal of Communication•2025

  • Congressional support for democratic norms on January 6th

    Open Access•Alison W Craig, Bethany Albertson•Political Science Research and…•2025

  • The Experience of Emotion

    Lisa Feldman Barrett, Batja Mesquita et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2007

  • Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • Cognitive Preoccupation with Breaking News and Compulsive Social Media Use

    Kathryn D Coduto, Jennifer Anderson•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2021

  • The dangers of blind trust

    Open Access•Xizhu Xiao, Porismita Borah et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2021

  • The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections

    Open Access•Nicolas Berlinski, Margaret Doyle et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2021

  • Trust Over Use

    Myiah J Hutchens, Jay D Hmielowski et al.•Mass Communication & Society•2021

  • Why we can’t talk openly about race

    Open Access•Osei Appiah, W P Eveland et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2021

  • The threat of increasing diversity

    Open Access•Brenda Major, Alison Blodorn et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2016

  • Exploring the Bases of Partisanship in the American Electorate

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Kyle L Saunders•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • Party Polarization and "Conflict Extension" in the American Electorate

    Geoffrey C Layman, Thomas M Carsey•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Compromising Positions

    Open Access•James M Glaser, Jeffrey M Berry•Political Science Quarterly•2018

  • Listening to President Obama

    Open Access•Efe Sevin, Spencer Kimball et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2011

  • The Rise of Presidential Eschatology

    Open Access•Bayleigh Elaine Bond, Ryan Neville-Shepard•American Behavioral Scientist•2023

Unique citing works8
Citations per year2,67
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae