Henry George on Property Rights
Reply to John Pullen
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7579232 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kris Feder (Bard College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 565-579 |
| Publication date | 2001-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Journal of Economics and Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-9246 • E-ISSN: 1536-7150 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1536-7150.00076 |
| OpenAlex | W2027060181 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
John Pullen argues that Henry George's proposal to “make land common property” is inconsistent with his proposal to tax rent. This reply argues that George's two formulations are consistent, and that Pullen has confused common property with state property. On the other hand, Pullen's conception of property as composed of a “basket of rights” focuses attention on the question of whether, as trustee of the common property, a Georgist regime should be understood to have certain rights (and obligations) to constrain private land use decisions
Art history · Epistemology · George (robot) · Law and economics · Political science · Private property · Property (philosophy) · Property rights · Sociology · State (computer science) · Computer Science · History · Law · Legal principles and applications · Philosophy · Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 2003 - 2025 (23) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |