Lost and found
The remarkable curatorial history of one of the earliest discoveries of Palaeolithic portable art
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7658478 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Silvia M Bello (0000-0003-3777-7887, Natural History Museum, corresponding author), M Bello (0000-0001-7004-359X), Gabrielle Delbarre (Natural History Museum), Simon Parfitt (0000-0003-2660-9570, Natural History Museum), A Parfitt, S A Parfitt, A P Currant (Natural History Museum), Rob Kruszyński (Natural History Museum), C Stringer (0000-0002-9183-7337, Natural History Museum), C B Stringer |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue | 335 |
| Pages | 237-244 |
| Publication date | 2013-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Antiquity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-598X • E-ISSN: 1745-1744 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0003598x00048742 |
| OpenAlex | W18132949 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 13 |
Reassessment of archives, early publications and the auditing of museum collections have often led to the discovery or rediscovery of long-forgotten specimens (e.g. Hollmann et at. 1986: 330; Fainer & Man-Estier 2011: 506, 520). The combination of initial poor recognition, insufcient scientic analysis and inadequate storage conditions, can cause the loss to science of important archaeological specimens. New analytical techniques may allow reconsideration of previous interpretations (e.g. P illon 2008: 720, 723-24; Hello et aZ. 2011; Higham et aZ. 2011: 522, 524) but in some cases it is the scientific value of a specimen that is not recognised at the moment of its discovery (e.g. Rosendahl et aZ. 2003: 277; Kaagan et aZ. 2011). Particularly revealing examples are those where the specimen found is the first of its kind. This was the case with the first handaxe recognised as manufactured by humans (Gamble & Kruszynski 2009: 468-70) or the rst two sets of Neanderthal fossil remains found respectively at Engis in 1829-30 and Gibraltar in 1848, which were not recognised as an early human species until after the 1856 discovery of _Neanderthal 1 at the Kleine Feldhofer Grotte in the Neander Valley near DUsseldorf, Germany (Stringer & Gamble 1993: 13). Similarly, lack of recognition caused the near loss of an engraved antler from the Magdalenian site of Neschers (France), possibly one of the first examples of Palaeolithic portable art
Ancient history · Archaeology · Biology · Genealogy · Neanderthal · Archaeological and Geological Studies · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · History · Paleontology · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
The earliest evidence for anatomically modern humans in northwestern Europe
In search of the Neanderthals
Œuvres d’art méconnues de Laugerie-Basse (Dordogne). Collection Capitaine Maurice Bourlon – Institut de paléontologie humaine, Paris
New Perspectives on Prehistoric Art
Rediscovery of the Badegoule 5 skeletal remains (Badegoule, le Lardin-Saint-Lazare, Dordogne, France)
Les premières fouilles de Lartet et Christy et la reconnaissance de l'homme antédiluvien en Périgord
Le gisement magdalénien de Neschers et sa situation par rapport à la coulée basaltique du Tartaret (Puy-de-Dôme)
First evidence of a whale-bone industry in the western European Upper Paleolithic
A rediscovered Javanese ceremonial axe housed in the Museum of Natural history at Mayence, FRG
Microscope Section Analysis of Pottery
Idées sur l'origine de l'homme en France de 1800 à 1871 entre Lamarck et Darwin
John Evans, Joseph Prestwich and the stone that shattered the time barrier
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,23 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2016 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |