Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mental models or methodological artefacts? Adults' naïve responses to a test of children's conceptions of the earth

Bibliographic Data

ID7676573
AuthorsGavin Nobes (0000-0003-1991-1130, University of East Anglia, corresponding author), Georgia Panagiotaki (0000-0002-2975-1196, University of East Anglia)
Year2009
Volume100
Issue2
Pages347-363
Publication date2009-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1348/000712608x332909
PMID18680639
OpenAlexW2104744365
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited23

Vosniadou and Brewer (1992) claim that children's drawings and answers to questions show that they have naïve, theory‐like ‘mental models’ of the earth; for example, they believe it to be flat, or hollow with people inside. However, recent studies that have used different methods have found little or no evidence of these misconceptions. The contrasting accounts, and possible reasons for the inconsistent findings, were tested by giving adults ( N =484) either the original task (designed for 5‐year olds) or a new version in which the same drawing instructions and questions were rephrased and clarified. Many adults' responses to the original version were identical to children's ‘naïve’ drawings and answers. The new version elicited substantially fewer non‐scientific responses. These findings indicate that even adults find the original instructions and questions ambiguous and confusing, and that this is the principal reason for their non‐scientific drawings and answers. Since children must find the task even more confusing than adults, this explanation very probably applies to many of their non‐scientific responses, too, and therefore accounts for the discrepant findings of previous research. ‘Naïve’ responses result largely from misinterpretation of Vosniadou and Brewer's apparently simple task, rather than from mental models of the earth

Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Earth (classical element) · Test (biology) · Diverse Educational Innovations Studies · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy

  • Astronomers’ representations of the earth and day / night cycle

    Open Access•Gavin Nobes, Valérie Frède et al.•Current Psychology•2023

  • The risk-return trade-off

    Open Access•Jacqueline P Leighton•British Journal of Educational…•2019

  • Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development

    Frank C Keil•Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive…•1989

  • Trust in Testimony

    Open Access•Paul L Harris, M A Koenig•Child Development•2006

  • How we know our minds

    Open Access•Alison Gopnik•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1993

  • Mental models of the earth

    Open Access•Stella Vosniadou, William F Brewer•Cognitive Psychology•1992

  • On Asking Children Bizarre Questions

    Open Access•Martin Hughes, Robert Grieve•First Language•1980

  • Heavenly Talk

    Open Access•Jan Schoultz, Roger Säljö et al.•Human Development•2001

  • Children's knowledge of astronomy and its change in the course of learning

    Open Access•Triin Hannust, Eve Kikas•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2006

  • Chomsky and his Critics

    Open Access•Anna McNay•Journal of Pragmatics•2005

  • Adults' representations of the Earth

    Open Access•Gavin Nobes, Georgia Panagiotaki•British Journal of Psychology•2007

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,29
Citation span2019 - 2023 (5)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae