Notes on the Nestorian Monument at Sianfu
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7685832 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lionel Giles (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1920 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 15-26 |
| Publication date | 1920-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0041-977X • E-ISSN: 1474-0699 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0041977x00101648 |
| OpenAlex | W4246943274, W4213276034, W2116698034 |
| Language | EN |
is used here as in Taoist phraseology, to indicate spiritual purity of nature, and cannot very well be translated “true” or “genuine” ( ), as Diaz takes it, followed by Legge and Saeki. A better definition is that formulated by Diaz himself when he comes to explain the word , namely: . We may observe in passing that the whole of this exordium strongly recalls the language of the Tao Tê Ching , especially in chapters 4 and 25. Nearly all that is said here of the Trinity might apply equally well to Tao. Diaz goes on to remark that is the fundamental attribute ( ) of God, and his fundamental condition ( ). But perhaps this is over-refinement. Other renderings are appended; the second and third seem to me faulty because they interpret as an adverb modifying
Adverb · Allusion · Ancient history · Art · Art history · Emperor · Epistemology · Humanities · Linguistics · Literature · Phraseology · Reflexive pronoun · Verb · Word (group theory) · Byzantine Studies and History · Chinese history and philosophy · Classics · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophical and Historical Studies · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|