Linguistic notes on magic bowls in the Moussaieff Collection
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7688960 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew Morgenstern (0000-0001-8526-941X, University of Haifa, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 349-367 |
| Publication date | 2005-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0041-977X • E-ISSN: 1474-0699 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0041977x05000200 |
| OpenAlex | W2114703270 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 5 |
The study of Babylonian Aramaic magic bowls has undergone something of a renaissance in recent years owing to a wave of new publications which have considerably enriched the corpus of texts now at the reader's disposal. In parallel, significant progress has been made in the identification, publication and study of accurate manuscripts of Babylonian Rabbinic literature. Based upon a close reading of recently published magic bowls from the Moussaieff Collection, this article seeks to indicate how the two corpora are mutually enlightening and dependent. An accurate reading and interpretation of the bowls depends upon an intimate knowledge of Babylonian Aramaic grammar, for which much is to be learnt from the best rabbinic manuscripts. At the same time, the magic bowls confirm the antiquity of many linguistic traits found in these rabbinic sources, and accordingly confirm their status as reliable witnesses to the Talmudic language
Art · Art history · Grammar · Identification (biology) · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Literature · MAGIC (telescope) · Reading (process) · The Renaissance · Ancient Near East History · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Classics · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,21 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2018 (7) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |