Notes on the shift from accusative constructions to prepositional phrases in Hebrew and Arabic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7691664 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Naphtali Kinberg (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1981 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 8-14 |
| Publication date | 1981-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0041-977X • E-ISSN: 1474-0699 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0041977x00104367 |
| OpenAlex | W2130876172 |
| Language | EN |
In an article published in the early sixties, M. Bogaert shows certain groups of verbs which in Biblical Hebrew (as well as in other north-western Semitic languages) may govern verbal suffixes instead of ‘dative’prepositions. This phenomenon is called by him ‘non-accusative verbal suffixes’. In his article ‘' et = ’ el “to, towards” in Biblical Hebrew', S. Izre'el argues that the particle ' et sometimes occurs in contexts that elsewhere require the prepositions ' el ‘to, towards’ or ' im ‘with’. He concludes thatwith ' et is a preposition which in Modern Hebrew may be rendered by ' im or ' el , similar to the Hebrew preposition bƏ - which is sometimes translated into English as ‘in’ and at other times as ‘at’, according to the context
Arabic · Art · Biblical Hebrew · Biblical studies · Context (archaeology) · Dative case · Hebrew · Hebrew Bible · Linguistics · Literature · Semitic languages · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|