Author Response to Murray, “The troubled legacies of gold mining in South Africa
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7700602 |
|---|---|
| Authors | G Hecht (0000-0003-1445-0785, Stanford University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 1-3 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-3968 • E-ISSN: 1923-3051 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00083968.2025.2524227 |
| OpenAlex | W4415770091 |
| Language | EN |
It’s one thing for a review to offer critique and disagreement. I’ve had plenty of those, and I enjoy the challenge they pose. And we’ve all seen reviews that, like this one, slam the author for no
Feature (linguistics) · Gold mining · Mining industry · Work (physics) · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Mining and Resource Management · South African History and Culture
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |