The politics of recognition of Crimean Tatar collective rights in the post-Soviet period
With special attention to the Russian annexation of Crimea
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7727154 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Filiz Tutku Aydın (0000-0002-0673-756X, Social Sciences University of Ankara, Turkey), Filiz Tutku Aydin, Fethi Kurtiy Sahin (0000-0002-6619-3023, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 39-50 |
| Publication date | 2019-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Communist and Post-Communist Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0967-067X • E-ISSN: 1873-6920 |
| Publisher | University of California Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.02.003 |
| OpenAlex | W2915965659 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 17 |
This paper examines the process of how Crimean Tatars strived to attain group-differentiated rights since they have returned to their homeland in the early 1990s. Whereas the politics of minority rights were viewed through security lens in earlier literature, we emphasize the significance of cultural constructs in influencing the minority policies, based on qualitative content analysis of “speech acts” of elites, and movement and policy documents. Focusing on the interaction of the framing processes of Crimean Tatars with the Crimean regional government, Ukraine, and Russia, we argue that the “neo-Stalinist frame” has played a major role in denying the rights of Crimean Tatars for self-determination and preservation of their ethnic identity in both pre and post annexation Crimea. The Crimean Tatars counter-framed against neo-Stalinist frame both in the pre and post-annexation period by demanding their rights as “indigenous people”. Ukraine experienced a frame transformation after the Euromaidan protests, by shifting from a neo-Stalinist frame into a “multiculturalist frame”, which became evident in recognition of the Crimean Tatar status as indigenous people of Crimea
Annexation · Homeland · Human rights · Indigenous · Minority rights · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Tatar · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Religion and Society Interactions · Soviet and Russian History
Deported Crimean Tatars in the Development of Productive Forces of Agriculture of the Uzbek SSR in the 1960s-1980s
Rus İlhakı Sonrasında Kırım Tatarlarına Yönelik İnsan Hakları İhlalleri
The new reality
Managed Regional Rivalry Between Russia and Turkey After the Annexation of Crimea
Imagining Crimean Tatar History since 2014
Staging indigeneity and autochthony in Northern Eurasia
The Paradox of Recognition Principles in Village Law in Ammatoa Kajang Indigenous Community
What makes a spokesperson? Delegation and symbolic power in Crimea
Diaspora's War and Peace
Musical Evolution and the Other
War and Memory in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus
Governance Networks in the Public Sector
Multicultural Citizenship
A community reimagined. The role of “homeland” in the forging of national identity
The Ethnogenesis of the Crimean Tatars. An Historical Reinterpretation
Conflict‐prevention in a transition state
Crimea
Reinstating Social Borders between the Slavic Majority and the Tatar Population of Crimea
An End to Silence
Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation
Crimean Tatars Return Home
Multi-Organizational Fields and Social Movement Organization Frame Content
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |