Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Daniel Voth , M. Wildcat , National Endowment for the Humanities and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program , Maria Di Salvo , Daniel H. Kaiser , Valerie A. Kivelson
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Department of Political Science and International Indigenous Studies Program, University of Calgary, Canada, University of Alberta Library
ANO 2017
TIPO Book
CITAÇÕES 3
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-14
MD5 B72CDA49FADD64139C2AE92436DC6C60

Resumo

The following seeks to advance relational research methods by providing more specificity in how relationality is defined, and by engaging commonly held refrains on relational research. Responding to concerns about Indigenous relationality being pan-Indigenous, we suggest a three-part framework that defines Indigenous relationality. First, relationality as a defining aspect of global Indigeneity; second, relational understandings that emerge from specific Indigenous nations and third, relationality as manifest within inter-Indigenous connections. Building on our definitional work, we argue that three common refrains within relational research methods should be extended. First, researchers should be able to balance a slippage between the particular context of Indigenous nations and the general context of Indigenous relationality. Second, we have to do more than simply value relationships, and consider how we use relationality for critical thinking. Finally, ensuring accountability within Indigenous research requires us to revisit how we analyze the concept of community.

Ferramentas