Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Locating Pawai in the Social Hierarchy of the Khasa

A Preliminary Note on Jumli Caste Structure

Bibliographic Data

ID7745150
AuthorsYouba Raj Luintel (0000-0003-4199-0293, Tribhuvan University, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume7
Pages31-50
Publication date2014-05-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1994-2664 • E-ISSN: 1994-2672
PublisherNepal Journals Online (JOL) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3126/dsaj.v7i0.10436
OpenAlexW2054689813
LanguageEN
References cited1

Until very recently, Jumla’s Pawai, or the Matawali Chhetri, have remained one of the very least understood caste groups in Nepal. In many sense Pawai can be considered as an unusual caste group and possess some unique yet paradoxical socio-cultural traits and claims. Overall, they represent Chhetri sub-caste, but in the Jumli caste hierarchy they are placed lower than Chhetri. They do not wear sacred thread called “janai,” do mostly worship masto, and in Bota village, some of them even offer liquor to their Hindu diety. This article attempts to explain the distinctive characteristics of Pawai in light of the Jumli caste hierarchy, and differs from some of the simplistic explanations of human ecological approach to argue that Pawai are simply the by-product of their cultural interface with the local ecology, or the reductionist arguments of identity politics that it is the ethnicity and not the class that differentiates society and forms different identity of the culturally marginalised one. This article first sheds lights on the social construction of Pawai as the kamsel caste group, takes into account the uniqueness of paddy cultivation in Jumla and its caste implications in the local political economy, and then compares and contracts the Pawai vis-a-vis the Jyulel to make an argument that the uniqueness of Pawai can only be meaningfully understood by placing them in their dynamic relationship with Jyulel. This relationship essentially entails a relationship of privilege and deprivation in terms of access to and ownership of jyula (as productive low lands). By implication, it is differential access to assets and resources that brings diversity and inequality in society and not the vice-versa. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v7i0.10436 Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology Vol. 7, 2013; 31-50

Aesthetics · Caste · Endogamy · Ethnic group · Hierarchy · Hinduism · Identity (music · Political science · Politics · Social group · Social science · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · Gender Studies · Law · South Asian Studies and Conflicts

  • Karnali under Stress

    Open Access•John J Metz, Barry C Bishop•Geographical Review•1991

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae