Challenges to mobilising resources for disaster recovery and reconstruction
Perspectives of the Haitian diaspora
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7750314 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emefa Sewordor (Graduate of the doctoral programme at the Department of Public Management and Policy Georgia State University United States, corresponding author), Ann‐margaret Esnard (0000-0002-6823-7202, Professor in the Department of Public Management and Policy Georgia State University United States, corresponding author), Alka Sapat (0000-0002-8575-0104, Professor in the School of Public Administration Florida Atlantic University United States, corresponding author), Lorena Schwartz (Doctoral candidate at the School of Public Administration Florida Atlantic University United States, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 336-354 |
| Publication date | 2019-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Disasters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0361-3666 • E-ISSN: 1467-7717 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/disa.12318 |
| PMID | 30431177 |
| OpenAlex | W2900910110 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 18 |
Diasporas and diaspora non‐governmental organisations (NGOs) are increasingly important as resource lifelines to their home countries, yet the resources that they mobilise, the types of challenges that they face, and their coping mechanisms are not well explored or understood in the context of disaster recovery. To fill this knowledge gap, this study employed an inductive qualitative methodological approach, using interviews to comprehend the role played by Haitian diaspora NGOs after the catastrophic earthquake in 2010. It found that resources take four common forms: event fundraisers; financial and material donations from supporters; remittances; and volunteer labour. Challenges include an overreliance on diaspora donors, competition among NGOs, and what is perceived as inequitable funding practices towards diaspora NGOs. The findings provide insights centred on better coordination among diaspora NGOs, as well as between diaspora NGOs and other local and international NGOs and local governments and international institutions, to ensure more efficient delivery of services to survivors
Business · Context (archaeology · Coping (psychology · Diaspora · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Resource (disambiguation · Social science · Sociology · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Disaster Management and Resilience · Gender Studies · Medicine · Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Disaster Risk Reduction in Mexico
Conducting fieldwork amidst earthquakes in Nepal
Between hope and hype
Improving human resource mobilisation for post-disaster recovery
The value of secondary use of data generated by non-governmental organisations for disaster risk management research
Is the Workers’ Health and Safety Scenario Different in Post-Disaster Reconstruction from Conventional Construction? A Case Study in Bhaktapur, Nepal
The value of NGOs in disaster management and governance in South Korea and Japan
Translocal responses to natural hazards
Identifying major challenges in managing post-disaster reconstruction projects
Vulnerability and the International Law Commission's Draft Articles on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters
Iran's Feminist School in the Diaspora
Diaspora Humanitarianism
Preserving the Publicness of the Nonprofit Sector
Coming Home after Disaster
Events and Effects
Remittances in the face of disasters
Transnationality and diaspora advocacy
Power groups, interests and interest groups in consolidated and transitional democracies
Remittances in Central America
The Politics of Philanthropy and Welfare Governance
The Strategic Orientations of US-Based NGOs
International Aid, Local Ownership, and Survival
Accountability for Empowerment
Creating an Enabling Environment for Diasporas’ Participation in Homeland Development
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,71 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |