Global Plants and Digital Letters

Epistemological Implications of Digitising the Directors' Correspondence at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Bibliographic Data

ID7763322
AuthorsAnna Svensson (0000-0002-0018-6998, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume6
Issue1
Pages73-102
Publication date2015-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Humanities (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2201-1919 • E-ISSN: 2201-1919
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/22011919-3615907
OpenAlexW2126341828
LanguageEN
References cited26

Digitisation is presenting new possibilities and challenges for the use of collections in both the humanities and the sciences. However, digitisation is also another layer in a longer process of selections shaping the collection—something which must be analysed on a case-by-case basis. This paper considers the epistemological implications of the digitisation of the Directors' Correspondence (DC) collection (1841-1928) at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, made available through the Global Plants database. In order to avoid a polarised analysis of the end-products of archive and database, the selection process shaping this collection is traced from the writing of the letters and their reception into the DC at RBG, Kew, to the digitisation with corresponding metadata and the end-user searching the database. Particular attention is given the digitisation process and the knowledge produced by the project digitisers, as they combine close reading and database searches in writing the summaries of the letters for the metadata. This analysis of the DC engages with wider discussions about digitisation by emphasising the importance of taking a longer historical perspective, with particular attention to moments of selection, and highlighting the knowledge generated by those involved in the digitisation process. By doing so, the result is not a clear trajectory but a combination of losses and gains, disconnections and reconnections. Care is therefore needed to avoid replicating the invisible losses of extractive approaches to knowledge production, particularly in the context of collection-based biodiversity conservation.1

Archaeology · Context (archaeology · Geography · Library science · Metadata · Political science · Process (computing · Reading (process · Selection (genetic algorithm · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Law · Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions · Plant Diversity and Evolution · Species Distribution and Climate Change · Artificial Intelligence

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access