Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Party differences and energy reform

Fiscal conservatism in the California legislature

Bibliographic Data

ID7763572
AuthorsDavid J He (0000-0001-8117-0260, Vanderbilt University, corresponding author), Jonathan S Coley (0000-0002-0829-6171, Vanderbilt University), Quan D Mai (0000-0001-5416-8499, Vanderbilt University), Lucas R Hilliard (Vanderbilt University)
Year2015
Volume24
Issue2
Pages228-248
Publication date2015-03-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-4016 • E-ISSN: 1743-8934
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09644016.2014.973222
OpenAlexW2052750482
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited38

Research building on political economy and ecological modernisation theories has paid increasing attention to the conditions that affect the prospects for environmental reform. Much work focuses on variation among political units in support of a single type of energy policy, whereas we examine within-state variation in support of a wide range of energy reform policies. Applying multilevel analyses to the 2011–2012 legislative session in California, we identify bill characteristics associated with divisions between Republicans and Democrats. Expanding the size or scope of government (through spending, government commissions, and business regulations) reduces support for energy reform among Republicans, whereas promoting transparency and other ‘good government’ initiatives reduces support among Democrats. In contrast with the standard view that Republicans oppose almost all energy reforms proposed by Democrats, we identify bill characteristics that increase the likelihood of support from both parties, namely tax reductions and credits, including for bills that promote renewable energy

Conservatism · Economics · Legislature · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration

  • Red states, green laws

    Open Access•David J He, Quan D Mai et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2015

  • Can solar energy become polarized? Understanding the role of expressive and negative partisanship in support for solar tax credits

    Open Access•Adam Mayer, E Keith Smith•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • The Oil Climax

    Open Access•Olufolahan Osunmuyiwa, Agni Kalfagianni•Energy Research & Social Science•2017

  • Understanding policymaker support of energy decarbonization policies for buildings

    Open Access•Reid Dorsey-Palmateer, Imran Sheikh et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2026

  • Education, political affiliation and energy policy in the United States

    Open Access•Adam Mayer, E Keith Smith•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  • National energy transition, local partisanship? Elite cues, community identity, and support for clean power in the United States

    Open Access•Adam Mayer•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Drought, Risk, and Institutional Politics in the American Southwest

    Open Access•David J He, Christopher A Wold et al.•Sociological Forum•2016

  • The effect of electronic program applications amidst the politics of administrative burden

    Open Access•Donavon Johnson, Alexander Kroll•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • The Ecology of Environmental Association

    Jonathan S Coley, Quan D Mai•Sociological Focus•2022

  • Partisanship, politics, and the energy transition in the United States

    Open Access•Adam Mayer•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • The politics of niche-regime conflicts

    Open Access•David J He•Environmental Innovation and…•2015

  • Subnational Environmental Policy

    Open Access•Ion Bogdan Vasi, Edward T Walker•Annual Review of Sociology•2024

  • Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards?

    Open Access•Thomas P Lyons, Thomas P Lyon et al.•The Energy Journal•2010

  • A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis

    Open Access•Peter Peduzzi, John Concato et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•1996

  • Environmental Sociology and the Explanation of Environmental Reform

    Open Access•Frederick H Buttel•Organization & Environment•2003

  • Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory

    Open Access•Richard York, Eugene A Rosa•Organization & Environment•2003

  • Open for Business

    Judith A Layzer•Open for business•2012

  • Ecological modernisation theory in debate

    Arthur P J Mol, Gert Spaargaren•Environmental Politics•2000

  • The role of social, political, and economic interests in promoting state green electricity policies

    Open Access•Stephan Vachon, Fredric C Menz•Environmental Science & Policy•2006

  • Cool dudes

    Open Access•Aaron M Mccright, Riley E Dunlap•Global Environmental Change•2011

  • Political economy and the adoption of everyday environmental policies in the American states, 1997

    Open Access•Brad Clark, Brad T Clark et al.•The Social Science Journal•2004

  • Convergence and Divergence in Renewable Energy Policy among US States from 1998 to 2011

    Michael Vasseur•Social Forces•2014

  • Money Talks

    Open Access•Frank J Sorauf•Political Science Quarterly•1993

  • Theory, culture and society

    Søren Damkjær•Dansk Sociologi•2006

  • Kindred spirits or intergovernmental competition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states (1990–2008)

    Daniel C Matisoff, Jason Edwards•Environmental Politics•2014

  • A middle range theorization of energy politics

    Rachael Shwom, Rachael L Shwom•Environmental Politics•2011

  • Social Movements and Industry Development

    Ion Bogdan Vasi, Ion Vasi•Mobilization An International…•2009

  • State Policy Innovativeness Revisited

    Open Access•Frederick J Boehmke, Paul Skinner•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2012

  • Partisan and Ideological Polarization in the California Electorate

    Open Access•Gary C Jacobson•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2004

  • Does the ‘California effect’ operate across borders? Trading- and investing-up in automobile emission standards

    Richard Perkins, E Neumayer•Journal of European Public Policy•2012

  • Renewable electricity policy in Asia

    Open Access•David J He, Quan D Mai•Environmental Innovation and…•2014

  • Policy Tool Interactions and the Adoption of State Renewable Portfolio Standards

    Open Access•Hongtao Yi, Richard C Feiock et al.•Review of Policy Research•2012

  • Trash or treasure

    Donna L Lybecker, Mark K Mcbeth et al.•Environmental Politics•2013

  • The proof of the pudding

    Anne Scheinberg•Environmental Politics•2003

  • Failure and opportunity

    Gary Bryner•Environmental Politics•2008

  • Advanced industrial countries

    D N Pellow, Allan Schnaiberg et al.•Environmental Politics•2000

  • State Environmental Policies

    Open Access•Peter J May, Peter May et al.•Review of Policy Research•2007

  • The Adoption of State Climate Change Policies and Renewable Portfolio Standards

    Open Access•Daniel C Matisoff•Review of Policy Research•2008

  • Postindustrialization and Environmental Quality

    Dana R Fisher, William R Freudenburg•Social Forces•2004

  • Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions

    Open Access•Frank W Geels•Theory Culture & Society•2014

Unique citing works12
Citations per year1,09
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae