Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Resilient peripheralisation through authoritarian communication against energy democracy in South Korea

Bibliographic Data

ID7763704
AuthorsSu Young Choi (0000-0001-9958-6512, Stetson University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume30
Issue6
Pages1002-1023
Publication date2021-09-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-4016 • E-ISSN: 1743-8934
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09644016.2020.1843884
OpenAlexW3109369793
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited33

To understand anti-democratic barriers to accomplishing energy democracy, I examine how and why a centralised energy system can maintain itself based on an ethnographic analysis of the local protest of the Miryang community against the Korea Electric Power Corporation’s construction of a 765,000-volt transmission line. In doing so, I incorporate the element of authoritarian communication into the framework of peripheralization – a socio-political reproduction of social, spatial, and environmental inequality caused by siting environmentally hazardous facilities in peripheral communities and reinforcing their powerlessness – to emphasize the aggressive role of government and industry actors. Composed of unidirectional projection, partial absorption, and forceful suppression, authoritarian communication makes the sacrifices of peripheral communities enduring, and consequently enables an undemocratic energy arrangement to be resilient and perpetual. To overcome this mechanism, I highlight the active roles of citizens to contest authoritarian communication and socio-environmental inequalities as a precondition to building a sustainable energy democracy

Authoritarianism · CONTEST · Corporation · Democracy · Economic system · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Energy and Environment Impacts · Law · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Water Governance and Infrastructure

  • Toward a State-led, Market-Enabled Commons

    Open Access•Chihsin Chiu•Urban Affairs Review•2023

  • Against the Colonization of Urban Development

    Open Access•Youjeong Oh•International Journal of Urban…•2023

  • Citizen or consumer? Reconsidering energy citizenship

    Breffní Lennon, Niall Dunphy et al.•Journal of Environmental Policy &…•2020

  • A Mathematical Theory of Communication

    Claude E Shannon•Bell System Technical Journal•1948

  • Strategic Framing of Climate Change by Industry Actors

    Inga Schlichting•Environmental Communication•2013

  • Site Fights

    Daniel P Aldrich•Site Fights•2011

  • Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice

    Richard Cowell, Gabriel Bristow et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2011

  • Social justice, fairness and exclusion in the South Korean electricity sector

    Open Access•John Dong-Yoon Kim, Eunkyoung Choi et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • Authoritarian communication on social media

    Open Access•Andrew Bulovsky•International Communication Gazette•2018

  • Dialogue in Agony

    Open Access•Andrew R Smith•Communication Theory•2008

  • Nuclear waste and landscapes of risk

    Andrew Blowers•Landscape Research•1999

  • Authoritarian environmentalism and China's response to climate change

    Bruce Gilley•Environmental Politics•2012

  • Energy democracy, dissent and discourse in the party politics of shale gas in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Laurence Williams, B K Sovacool•Environmental Politics•2020

  • Negotiating energy democracy in practice

    Open Access•Bregje Van Veelen•Environmental Politics•2018

  • Conceptualizing energy democracy

    Kacper Szulecki•Environmental Politics•2017

  • Framing authoritarian legitimacy

    Laura A Bray, T E Shriver et al.•Social movement studies•2019

  • Soft Repression and the Current Wave of Social Mobilisations in Spain

    Óscar J Martín García•Social movement studies•2014

  • Authoritarian capitalism, authoritarian movements and authoritarian communication

    Open Access•Catherine Fuchs•Media Culture & Society•2018

  • The contested politics of the Asian atom

    Jinyoung Park, B K Sovacool•Environmental Politics•2018

  • Economic development, democracy and citizenship politics in South Korea

    Kyung-Sup Chang, Kyung‐sup Chang•Citizenship Studies•2012

  • Prospective environmental injustice

    Irina Velicu•Environmental Politics•2020

  • Modernisation, authoritarianism, and the environment

    Scott M Moore, Scott Moore•Environmental Politics•2014

  • The 'efficacy dilemma' of transnational climate activism

    Joost De Moor•Environmental Politics•2018

  • Direct climate action as public pedagogy

    Callum Mcgregor•Environmental Politics•2015

  • Authoritarian environmentalism under democracy

    Heejin Han•Environmental Politics•2015

  • Power, politics and environmental inequality

    Andrew Blowers, Pieter Leroy•Environmental Politics•1994

  • The Power of Instability

    Ching Kwan Lee, Yonghong Zhang•American Journal of Sociology•2013

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae