Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exploring Response Differences between Face-to-Face and Web Surveys

A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the Dutch European Values Survey 2008

Bibliographic Data

ID7774142
AuthorsMargot Bennink (Tilburg University, corresponding author), Guy Moors (Tilburg University), John Gelissen (0000-0002-5232-6649, Tilburg University)
Year2013
Volume25
Issue4
Pages319-338
Publication date2013-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCAM (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-8513 • E-ISSN: 1552-3969
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1525822x12472875
OpenAlexW2108907052
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited12

Can existing longitudinal surveys profit from the (financial) advantages of web surveying by switching survey mode from face-to-face interviews to web surveys? Before such a radical change in data collection procedure can be undertaken, it needs to be established that mode effects cannot confound the responses to the survey items. To this end, the responses of the Dutch European Values Study of 2008 were compared to the responses of a time parallel web survey. The responses on 163 of the 256 items differed significantly across modes. To explain these response differences between modes, an exploratory crisp set qualitative comparative analysis approach was used. Five sufficient conditions—combinations of survey mode characteristics—but no necessary conditions for response differences between survey modes were found. Two survey characteristics were neither necessary nor sufficient to produce the outcome. Results suggest that switching modes may affect comparability between waves in a longitudinal survey

Comparability · Data collection · Human–computer interaction · Mode (computer interface) · Statistics · Survey data collection · Survey methodology · Survey research · Web survey · World Wide Web · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Mathematics · Psychology · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Beyond mean comparisons

    Open Access•Ahmet Bardakcı, Salih Bardakcı et al.•Methodological Innovations•2026

  • Associations between meal complexity and social context in four Nordic countries

    Open Access•Nina Kahma, Johanna Mäkelä et al.•Anthropology of food•2014

  • Redesigning Social Inquiry

    C C Ragin•Redesigning Social Inquiry•2008

  • Conclusions—the Way(s) Ahead

    Benoît Rihoux, C C Ragin et al.•Comparative methods•2009

  • Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

    Open Access•Patrick A Mello•Democratic Participation in Armed…•2014

  • The Comparative Method

    C C Ragin•Comparative Method•1989

  • Conducting Research Surveys via E-mail and the Web

    Matthias Schonlau, Ronald D Fricker et al.•Conducting Research Surveys Via…•2002

  • Configurational Comparative Methods

    Benoît Rihoux, C C Ragin et al.•Comparative methods•2009

  • Mode Differences Between Face-to-Face and Web Surveys

    Dirk Heerwegh•International Journal of Public…•2009

  • Survey Mode as a Source of Instability in Responses across Surveys

    Open Access•Don A Dillman, Leah Melani Christian•CAM•2005

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,17
Citation span2014 - 2026 (13)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae