Striving for sovereignty across the cloud finance stack
A relational comparison of the United States, the European Union, and China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7774182 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Bassens (0000-0002-5368-7884, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, corresponding author), Cheng Fang (0000-0001-7079-5644, Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Ulysses Pascal (0000-0002-0737-3534, Vrije Universiteit Brussel) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-21 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Finance and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2059-5999 • E-ISSN: 2059-5999 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/fas.2025.10019 |
| OpenAlex | W4415266800 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 46 |
Platform finance implies financial institutions’ growing dependence on the infrastructure and technologies of large tech firms. This reliance manifests itself most clearly in cloud services provision where American technological hegemony has triggered concerns about technological sovereignty in the European Union. In China, American Big Techs have not gained much of a foothold given the role of domestic Techfins in a wider attempt to install algorithmic governance. The observed interdependencies and segmentations of global digital technology networks warrant a further analysis of how cloud finance becomes enmeshed in wider geopolitical power struggles. Based on official document analysis, this article studies the geopolitical dimensions of cloud finance regulation in the EU, the US, and China. Given the fragmented nature of cloud regulation, it compiles insights from data protection, market competition, financial sector regulation, and cybersecurity to understand how cloud finance is governed in each macro-block. Our analysis shows how regulation in the three blocs supports US financial cloud hegemony, whilst producing financial cloud subordination of its geopolitical ally the EU and drawing China into financial cloud insulation
China · Cloud computing · Financial crisis · Financial services · Geopolitics · Hegemony · Interdependence · Sovereignty · Banking stability, regulation, efficiency · Economic Issues in Ukraine · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Digital Empires
Corporate Sovereignty
The Platform Society
The Stack
Planning for science
‘If you believe in a platform world…’ – Corporate banking and digital transformation in investor relations discourse
When Territory Deborders Territoriality
The digital rise and its economic implications for China through the Digital Silk Road under the Belt and Road Initiative
FinTech platform regulation
The Rise of Digital Financialisation
Emergent regime complexity and epistemic barriers in ‘bigtech’ finance
Digital Silk Road” as a Slogan Instead of a Grand Strategy
Mandatory clearing
Big Tech
The Big Techification of Everything
The state as container
Financial geography I
Cloud geographies
Integrating Finance into Global Production Networks
Banking in the cloud
Underground empire
The Brussels Effect
Preserving the obligatory passage point
Playful finance
Asserting Europe's technological sovereignty amid American platform finance
The sovereign cloud’ in Europe
Financialization and its discontents
No More Credit to Europe? Cross-Border Bank Lending, Financial Integration, and the Rebirth of the National Scale as a Credit Scorecard
Weaponised interdependence in a bipolar world
Global digital networks
Digital sovereignty - Rhetoric and reality
Infrastructural Geopolitics
Stay or leave? US-listed Chinese companies under financial decoupling push and the reshaping of global financial networks
Financializing authoritarian capitalism
World Cities and the Uneven Geographies of Financialization
Platform capitalism and cloud infrastructure
Strategic coupling between finance, technology and the state
Democratizing finance with Robinhood
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |