The US Grand Strategy and the Eurasian Heartland in the Twenty-First Century

Bibliographic Data

ID7784951
AuthorsEmre Işeri (0000-0002-0142-1240, Keele University, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume14
Issue1
Pages26-46
Publication date2009-02-13
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeopolitics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1465-0045 • E-ISSN: 1557-3028
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14650040802578658
OpenAlexW1987435416
LanguageEN
Citations received12

From an offensive realist theoretical approach, this paper assumes that great powers are always looking for opportunities to attain more power in order to feel more secure. This outlook has led me to assert that the main objective of the US grand strategy in the twenty-first century is primacy or global hegemony. I have considered the US grand strategy as a combination of wartime and peacetime strategies and argued that the Caspian region and its hinterland, where I call the Eurasian Heartland, to use the term of Sir Halford Mackinder, has several geo-strategic dimensions beyond its wide-rich non-OPEC untapped hydro-carbon reserves, particularly in Kazakhstan. For my purposes, I have relied on both wartime strategy (US-led Iraq war) and peacetime strategy of supporting costly Baku-Tbilis-Ceyhan (BTC) to integrate regional untapped oil reserves, in particular Kazakh, into the US-controlled energy market to a great extent. This pipeline's contribution to the US grand strategy is assessed in relation to potential Eurasian challengers, Russia and China. The article concludes with an evaluation of the prospects of the US grand strategy in the twenty-first century

China · Economics · Economy · Grand strategy · Great power · Hegemony · Management · Offensive · Peacetime · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Global Energy Security and Policy · Law · Russia and Soviet political economy

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access