Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Agenda setting in the German Bundestag

A weak government in a consensus democracy

Bibliographic Data

ID7785403
AuthorsUlrich Sieberer (0000-0003-4027-1393, University of Mannheim, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume15
Issue1
Pages49-72
Publication date2006-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGerman Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-4008 • E-ISSN: 1743-8993
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09644000500534972
OpenAlexW2043045874
LanguageEN
Citations received21
References cited26

Government agenda-setting rights in the Bundestag are weak. The theoretical part of this article discusses various aspects of agenda setting and their theoretical relevance in the context of the Bundestag. It will be argued that analyses of agenda setting should distinguish between two analytical foci, one concentrating on policy effects in the context of spatial models, the other analysing executive–legislative relations in the broader context of political competition. In addition, agenda setting among veto players should be distinguished from agenda setting between veto players and non-veto players. While the article's theoretical part drives the subsequent empirical analysis, readers more interested in the empirical aspects of agenda setting in the Bundestag may wish to turn directly to the article's second section, which provides an empirical and descriptive account of the formal rules of agenda setting in the Bundestag. In this part, it will be argued that the weakness of the government under the Bundestag's first permanent rules of procedure introduced in the early 1950s can be explained by historic circumstances. Since then, party system characteristics and the strong role of the Bundesrat have made it unattractive for the federal government to seek increased agenda control in the Bundestag. Overall, agenda setting rules in the Bundestag underscore the characterisation of Germany as a consensus democracy

Context (archaeology · Democracy · Economics · German · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Legislature · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Relevance (law · Sociology · Veto · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration

  • Towards Convergence? New Labour's Third Way and the SPD's Agenda 2010 in Comparative Perspective

    Christian Schweiger•Sozialer Fortschritt•2010

  • Konzeptionalisierung und Messung formalen Institutionenwandels – Das Beispiel parlamentarische Regeln

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer, PETER MEIßNER et al.•Zeitschrift für Vergleichende…•2014

  • Institutional dynamics and party think tank development

    Narelle Miragliotta•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2018

  • Wie gelangen Themen auf die parlamentarische Agenda

    Open Access•Karina Hohl•Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft•2017

  • Conflict and Consensus in Germany's Bi-cameral System

    Thomas Saalfeld•Debatte Journal of Contemporary…•2006

  • Political central bank coverage

    Open Access•Hugo Oriola, Matthieu Picault•Public Choice•2025

  • The Institutional Power of Western European Parliaments

    Ulrich Sieberer•West European Politics•2011

  • Negative Agenda Control and Executive–Legislative Relations in East Central Europe, 1997–2008

    Radoslaw Zubek•Journal of Legislative Studies•2011

  • Shadow chairs as monitoring device? A comparative analysis of committee chair powers in Western European parliaments

    Ulrich Sieberer, Daniel Höhmann•Journal of Legislative Studies•2017

  • Going institutional’ to overcome obstruction

    Open Access•Ulrich Sieberer, JULIA F DUTKOWSKI et al.•European Journal of Political…•2020

  • No politics in the agenda-setting meeting

    Open Access•Simon Otje•West European Politics•2019

  • Free votes and the analysis of recorded votes

    Open Access•Tamaki Ohmura, David M Willumsen•West European Politics•2023

  • Reforming the Rules of the Parliamentary Game

    Ulrich Sieberer, Wolfgang C Müller et al.•West European Politics•2011

  • How effects on party unity vary across votes

    Open Access•Christian Stecker•Party Politics•2015

  • Recorded Votes as Attention Booster

    Open Access•Lukas Hohendorf, Ulrich Sieberer et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • How much power do oppositions have? Comparing the opportunity structures of parliamentary oppositions in 21 democracies

    Julian Garritzmann, Julian L Garritzmann•Journal of Legislative Studies•2017

  • Policy-making power of opposition players

    Open Access•Simone Wegmann•Journal of Legislative Studies•2022

  • Discipline, Electoral Rules and Defection in the Bundestag, 1983–94

    Marlis Becher, Michael Becher et al.•German Politics•2008

  • Delay as a Political Technique under Divided Government? Empirical Evidence from Germany, 1976–2005

    Philip Manow, Simone Burkhart•German Politics•2008

  • Communicating supranational governance? The salience of EU affairs in the German Bundestag, 1991–2013

    Open Access•Christian Rauh•European Union Politics•2015

  • Institutional Factors and Agreement in Lawmaking

    Open Access•Ángel Benítez, Beatriz Carrasco et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2024

  • The Efficient Secret

    Open Access•Gary W Cox•Efficient Secret•1987

  • Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies

    Kaare W Strøm, Kaare Strom et al.•Delegation and accountability in…•2003

  • Rationalizing Parliament

    Open Access•John D Huber•Rationalizing Parliament•1996

  • Making and Breaking Governments

    Open Access•Michael Laver, Kenneth A Shepsle•Making and Breaking Governments•1996

  • Instability of Simple Dynamic Games

    Norman Schofield•The Review of Economic Studies•1978

  • Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey•Journal of Economic Theory•1976

  • Das politische System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    Open Access•Wolfgang Rudzio•Politische System der Bundesrepubli…•2003

  • Veto Players

    George Tsebelis•Veto Players•2002

  • Das politische System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    Open Access•Florian Grotz, Wolfgang Schroeder•Das politische System der…•2021

  • Patterns of democracy

    Laura Morales Diez De Ulzurrun•Choice Reviews Online•2000

  • Time as a Scarce Resource

    Phyllis Moen, Thomas Juster et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1987

  • Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo

    Open Access•Thomas Romer, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Public Choice•1978

  • Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe

    Open Access•Bjørn Erik Rasch•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • Agenda-setting in the German Bundestag

    Gerhard Loewenberg•Journal of Legislative Studies•2003

  • The keys to togetherness

    Kaare W Strøm, Kaare Strom et al.•Journal of Legislative Studies•1999

  • Bicameralism and Party Politics in Germany

    Open Access•Thomas König•Political Studies•2001

  • Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations

    Open Access•Anthony King•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1976

  • Party unity in parliamentary democracies

    Ulrich Sieberer•Journal of Legislative Studies•2006

  • Chancellor Schröder's approach to political and legislative leadership

    Werner J Patzelt•German Politics•2004

  • The German Party System

    Thomas Saalfeld•German Politics•2002

  • The checks and balances of party federalism

    Open Access•Thomas Bräuninger, Thomas König•European Journal of Political…•1999

  • Making Policy Stick

    William B Heller•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Promises and Pitfalls of Veto Player Analysis

    Open Access•Steffen Ganghof•Swiss Political Science Review•2003

  • Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure

    Open Access•Daniel Diermeier, Timothy Feddersen et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies

    Open Access•John D Huber•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Bargaining in Legislatures

    Open Access•David P Baron, John Ferejohn et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

Unique citing works21
Citations per year1,05
Citation span2006 - 2025 (20)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 21

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae