Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Diglossia and language ideology Petrarch on linguistic variation and differentiation

Bibliographic Data

ID7795027
AuthorsMarco Spreafico (The Warburg Institute, School of Advanced Study, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume47
Issue1
Pages19-48
Publication date2020-10-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistoriographia Linguistica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0302-5160 • E-ISSN: 1569-9781
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/hl.00061.spr
OpenAlexW3080917203
LanguageEN
References cited18

Petrarch’s metalinguistic observations are scattered throughout his work, rare and for the most part elliptical. The present article closely examines Petrarch’s statements about language to arrive at an alternative interpretation to that of previous scholarship. We analyse the ideas, attitudes and beliefs that inform Petrarch’s conception of the difference between Latin and the vernacular languages. The first section provides a critique of the now prevailing view on Petrarch’s metalinguistic thinking. Mirko Tavoni and Silvia Rizzo hypothesize that Petrarch ‘was not conscious of being bilingual’, since he considered Latin and vernaculars as different stylistic varieties of one and the same language. In the remaining two sections we propose an alternative account. Comparing statements made by contemporaries of Petrarch and investigating their origin and rationale, we suggest that Petrarch’s conception and practice cannot be accounted for within a modern perspective of national language and are better captured by the notion of diglossia, in which two linguistic varieties are delimited by the contexts of their use

Art · Diglossia · History of linguistics · Ideology · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Literature · Neuroscience of multilingualism · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Scholarship · Sociology · Vernacular · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · History · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Philosophy · Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies

  • Language in Society

    Suzanne Romaine•Language in Society•2000

  • Humanism and Education in Medieval and Renaissance Italy

    Open Access•Robert Black•Humanism and Education in…•2001

  • Ausbau sociolinguistics and the perception of language status in contemporary Europe

    Open Access•Peter Trudgill•International Journal of Applied…•1992

  • Understanding Arabic

    Jeffrey Heath, Alaa Elgibali•Language•1998

  • Methodology of Social Sciences

    Max Weber•Methodology of Social Sciences•2017

  • Bilingualism With and Without Diglossia; Diglossia With and Without Bilingualism

    Open Access•Joshua A Fishman•Journal of Social Issues•1967

  • Petrarch, Latin, and Italian Renaissance Latinity

    Christopher S Celenza•Journal of Medieval and Early…•2005

  • Orality, Literacy, and Medieval Textualization

    Walter J Ong•New Literary History•1984

  • Outline of a theory of diglossia

    Alan Hudson•International Journal of the…•2002

  • Diglossia

    Charles A Ferguson•WORD•1959

  • Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization

    Open Access•James Milroy•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2001

  • Decline and Survival of Western Prestige Languages

    Henry, Henry Kahane et al.•Language•1979

  • Islam Observed

    I M Lewis, Clifford Geertz•Man•1969

  • Dialect, Language, Nation1

    Open Access•Einar Haugen•American Anthropologist•1966

  • Status and Style in Language

    Judith T Irvine, J Irvine•Annual Review of Anthropology•1985

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae