Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Unidade e diversidade na Antiguidade Tardia

A atuação do imperador Teodósio II na controvérsia em torno da natureza do corpo de Cristo entre Cirilo de Alexandria e Nestório de Constantinopla (428-450 d.C.) * Unity and diversity in the Late Antiquity

Bibliographic Data

ID7799783
AuthorsDaniel De Figueiredo (0000-0002-3458-3772, Universidade de Franca, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume2
Issue1
Pages205
Publication date2013-08-19
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistória e Cultura (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2238-6270 • E-ISSN: 2238-6270
PublisherRevista Historia e Cultura (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.18223/hiscult.v2i1.831
OpenAlexW1521674508
LanguagePT
References cited5

Esse artigo analisa a atuação do imperador Teodósio II (408-450) no conflito teológico que emergiu durante o seu governo e ficou conhecido pela historiografia como Controvérsia Nestoriana. Tal conflito foi protagonizado pelos bispos Cirilo de Alexandria e Nestório de Constantinopla, que divergiam acerca do relacionamento estabelecido entre as naturezas divina e humana do Cristo encarnado. Uma vez que formulações teológicas dessa natureza, na Antiguidade Tardia, serviam de suporte para formulações ideológicas de sustentação e unidade do poder imperial, pretendemos destacar o papel de centralidade do imperador como mediador desse conflito. Palavras-chave: Antiguidade Tardia – Conflito político-religioso-administrativo – Controvérsia Nestoriana. Abstract: This article analyzes the performance of the Emperor Theodosius II (408-450) at the theological conflict that emerged during his government and got notorious by historiography as Nestorian Controversy. Such a conflict was led by the bishops Cyril of Alexandria and Nestorius of Constantinople, who diverged about the relationship established between the divine and human natures of the incarnate Christ. Since theological formulations of such nature were used in Late Antiquity to support ideological formulations of sustaining and unity of the imperial power, we aim to highlight the role of centrality of the Emperor as a mediator in this conflict. Keywords: Late Antiquity – Political, religious and administrative Conflict – Nestorian Controversy

Alliance · Ancient history · Emperor · Humanities · Political science · Theology · Byzantine Studies and History · Historical and Religious Studies of Rome · History · Law · Philosophy

  • The prosopography of the later Roman Empire

    A H M Jones, J Morris et al.•The prosopography of the later…•1971

  • Historiography in the Age of Constantine

    Friedhelm Winkelmann•Greek and Roman Historiography in…•2003

  • The Late Antique Bishop

    Open Access•Rita Lizzi Testa•A Companion to Late Antiquity•2009

  • The later Roman Empire, 284-602

    A H M Jones•The later Roman Empire, 284-602•1964

  • Modern Interpretations of Nestorius

    Open Access•Carl E Braaten•Church History•1963

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae