Rural-Urban Differences in Responses to Field Techniques
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7800760 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kenneth J Cooper (0000-0001-7603-4619, SRI International, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1959 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 135-139 |
| Publication date | 1959-09-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-7259 • E-ISSN: 1938-3517 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.17730/humo.18.3.0310587032377406 |
| OpenAlex | W2017834629 |
| Language | EN |
A difficulty one encounters when engaged in research which involves both rural and urban populations lies in the adaptation of particular techniques to different segments of the total sample. Can the same research tool be used to elicit information among urbanites that is used when working with people in the rural countryside
Adaptation (eye) · Field (mathematics) · Field research · Geography · Political science · Regional science · Rural area · Sample (material) · Social science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Education Systems and Policy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|