On the Power of the European Court of Human Rights to Order Specific Non-monetary Measures
Some Remarks in Light of the Assanidze, Broniowski and Sejdovic Cases
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7801150 |
|---|---|
| Authors | V Colandrea (Federico II University Hospital, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 396-411 |
| Publication date | 2007-03-27 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Rights Law Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-7781 • E-ISSN: 1744-1021 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/hrlr/ngm011 |
| OpenAlex | W2074270136 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
In the field of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR or the Convention), an interesting and controversial issue concerns the powers of the European Court of Human Rights (Court) to order specific non-monetary remedies for violations of the Convention. The ECHR does not expressly provide for such a power. According to Article 41 of the Convention, the Court may only afford just satisfaction to victims when the domestic law of the respondent State ‘allows only partial reparation to be made’.1 Furthermore, Article 46 of the Convention provides that judgments of the Court are binding on the respondent State, and their execution will be supervised by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe.2 On the basis of these provisions, traditionally the Court has recognised that a judgment that establishes a violation of the ECHR has a ‘declaratory’ character, and it is for the respondent State...
Business · Convention · Human rights · Order (exchange) · Political science · Respondent · State (computer science) · Computer Science · European and International Law Studies · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Law · Taxation and Legal Issues
Constitutionalization and the Unity of the Law of International Responsibility
The Open Architecture of European Human Rights Law
The Admissibility Criterion Under Article 35(3)(b) Echr
Domestic Judicial Design by International Human Rights Courts
Beyond Constitutionalism
The International Criminal Court Statute and the Failure to Mention Symbolic Reparation
Crisis Communication in Public Health Emergencies
The power of human rights tribunals
| Citations per year | 0.44 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2008 - 2018 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |