Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Managing Judicial Innovation in the European Court of Human Rights

Bibliographic Data

ID7801234
AuthorsFiona De Londras (0000-0002-3555-6311, Institute for Legal Studies, corresponding author), Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou (0000-0001-9253-6109, University of Surrey)
Year2015
Volume15
Issue3
Pages523-547
Publication date2015-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Rights Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-7781 • E-ISSN: 1744-1021
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/hrlr/ngv020
OpenAlexW1957687624
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited1

Since its establishment, the European Court of Human Rights has developed into a constitutionalist actor within and beyond the continent of Europe; a development that is in no small part due to judicial innovations, such as evolutive interpretation. Such innovation has resulted in a tension between the Court and the contracting parties that may conceivably call into question states’ diffuse support for the Court. We argue that this tension is addressed by the Court by means of a nascent model of judicial self-restraint discernible from the Court’s docket management, its cognisance of non-legal factors in particularly contentious cases and its use of consensus-based interpretation. While arguably necessary, such a model is not cost-free; rather, it may have implications for the quality of the Court’s decision-making and its standing in the eyes of other stakeholders, such as non-governmental organizations and complainants.

Constitutionalism · Democracy · Human rights · Interpretation (philosophy) · Judicial interpretation · Political science · Politics · Quality (philosophy) · Sociology · Dispute Resolution and Class Actions · European and International Law Studies · International Arbitration and Investment Law · Law

  • Wearing religious symbols at work in the ECtHR’s judgments

    Open Access•Piotr Sadowski•Toruńskie Studia Polsko-Włoskie•2021

  • Konstytucja RP w perspektywie orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka

    Open Access•Aleksandra Mezykowska•Studia Prawnicze / The Legal…•2022

  • Uncertainty and international adjudication

    Open Access•Arthur Dyevre•Leiden Journal of International Law•2018

  • Backlash and Judicial Restraint

    Open Access•Øyvind Stiansen, Erik Voeten•International Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Determining the State of Exception

    Open Access•Stephen Tierney•Modern Law Review•2005

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2018 - 2022 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae