A frequency, coverage, and dispersion analysis of the academic collocation list in university student writing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7802043 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ping-Yu Huang (0000-0001-9538-5625, The General Education Center , Ming Chi University of Technology , New Taipei City , Taiwan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 617-653 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0019-042X • E-ISSN: 1613-4141 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/iral-2023-0129 |
| OpenAlex | W4387423908 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 45 |
This study investigates whether cross-disciplinary academic collocation lists are of equal importance to EAP (English for academic purposes) learners across different disciplines. We target Ackermann and Chen’s (Ackermann, Kirsten & Yu-Hua Chen. 2013. Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL)–A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(4). 235–247) Academic Collocation List (ACL) and conduct a frequency, coverage, and dispersion analysis of its 2,464 pairs in the British Academic Written English (BAWE) corpus. Using BAWE data, we also examine whether university students increase use of academic collocations across years. Generally, our results indicate that cover-all academic collocation lists, like academic word lists, show uneven frequency distributions across disciplines; the ACL covers considerably more word combinations in soft than hard sciences. According to our dispersion analysis, furthermore, an important cause for such skewed distributions is that a substantial part of the ACL (i.e., almost 25 %) is in actuality discipline-specific rather than generic collocations. In terms of collocation development, we do observe steady increases across years. Interestingly, university students throughout levels not only use more academic collocations, but display a stronger tendency to raise the proportion of discipline-specific collocations in writing. This study is novel as it systematically examines distributions and developments of academic collocations, and is pedagogically valuable in that it collects 483 ACL entries which are suitable targets for EAP learning
Academic writing · Collocation (remote sensing) · Discipline · English for academic purposes · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Sociology · Computer Science · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Text Readability and Simplification
Learning Vocabulary in Another Language
Formulaic Language and the Lexicon
Why EAP is necessary
Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL) – A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach
Discipline and Level Specificity in University Students' Written Vocabulary
Phraseology and Second Language Proficiency
The Treatment of Collocations and Idioms in Learners' Dictionaries
A Phrasal Expressions List
A New Academic Vocabulary List
The Use of Collocations by Advanced Learners of English and Some Implications for Teaching
An Academic Formulas List
L2 collocation profiles and their relationship with vocabulary proficiency
Parameters of variation in the use of words in empirical research writing
Lexical and grammatical collocations in beginning and intermediate L2 argumentative essays
The academic English collocation list
Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora
The Contribution of Dictionary Use to the Production and Retention of Collocations in a Second Language
A New Academic Word List
Is There an “Academic Vocabulary”
Reading English for Specialized Purposes
L1 Influence on the Acquisition of L2 Collocations
Lexical and Syntactic Research for the Design of EFL Reading Materials
Roles of Vocabulary Knowledge for Success in English‐Medium Instruction
Verb-Noun Collocations in Second Language Writing
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |