On the Theorem of Correspondence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7803022 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Krøjgaard (0000-0002-4976-0866, Aarhus University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 29-38 |
| Publication date | 2017-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1932-4502 • E-ISSN: 1936-3567 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12124-016-9363-5 |
| PMID | 27650076 |
| OpenAlex | W2522418133 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 21 |
In a recent paper, Mammen (Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50, 196-233, 2016a) brought novel arguments into the discussion concerning the importance of being able to single out and track objects through space and time. Mammen offered a formal account of two basic, yet distinct, ways in which we as human beings encounter objects in the real world, that is, sense and choice categories. In this paper I discuss aspects of his theory and in particular the Theorem of Correspondence. I shall attempt to argue that Mammen's formal account is indeed a novel and powerful analytical generic tool allowing us to see the important relevance in different domains of being able to establish choice categories. Meanwhile, I will attempt to show that evidence from the so-called multiple object tracking studies -- even though these use highly artificial stimuli -- provide compelling evidence in support of Mammen's formal account
Epistemology · Mathematical economics · Sociology · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Cognitive Science and Mapping · Mathematics · Philosophy · Spatial Cognition and Navigation
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |