Who Is Your Biggest Critic? Cultural Variation in Moral Judgments of the Self and Others
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7842836 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cristina E Salvador (0000-0002-6836-2126, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA, corresponding author), Cindel White (0000-0001-6050-2449, York University), Cindel J M White (York University, Toronto, ON, Canada), Ting Ai (0000-0003-1883-7071, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 535-552 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0221 • E-ISSN: 1552-5422 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00220221241255673 |
| OpenAlex | W4399292981 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 36 |
People are motivated to punish others who commit immoral actions when they believe the person willingly committed such an act. Compared with European American individuals, East Asian individuals are more punitive of wrongdoings, yet are less likely to attribute actions to the person. Here, we drew on research in cultural psychology to test the prediction that Chinese individuals are more punitive in part because they are more self-critical than European American individuals. This prediction would imply that cultural differences in punishment are most pronounced in judgments of oneself (vs. others) and largely driven by a difference in self-enhancement motives. To test this prediction, we conducted two studies, where 1,563 participants imagined immoral (vs. moral) actions performed by themselves or others. We then measured self-enhancement (how much participants perceived the immoral act impacts self-esteem) and attributions (how much participants perceived the immoral act is due to the person). As predicted, Chinese individuals punished immoral behavior more than European American individuals, which was explained by Chinese individuals being less self-enhancing, as indicated by a greater perception that immoral actions will negatively impact their self-esteem. Dispositional attributions predicted punishment regardless of culture. This work highlights how cultural differences in self-enhancement are key to understanding moral judgments and their cultural variation
Astronomy · Sociology · Variation (astronomy · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Mapping cultural tightness and its links to innovation, urbanization, and happiness across 31 provinces in China
Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?
In Search of East Asian Self-Enhancement
Free Will and Punishment
Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat
Cultural Psychology
Cultural Similarities and Differences in Social Inference
My True Self is Better Than Yours
Where Is the Evidence for Pancultural Self-Enhancement? A Reply to Sedikides, Gaertner, and Toguchi (2003)
Emotionally expressive interdependence in Latin America
A cultural task analysis of implicit independence
Cultural variations on optimistic and pessimistic bias for self versus a sibling
Culture and the self
Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality
Culture and cause
The self-importance of moral identity
Free to punish
Pancultural self-enhancement
Varieties of interdependence and the emergence of the Modern West
Self-assertive interdependence in Arab culture
Illusion and well-being
The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |