Discourses in the European Commission’s 1996–2000 Health Promotion Programme

Dados Bibliográficos

ID7844201
AutoresCatherine Marie Sykes, Catherine Sykes (0000-0002-8518-5184), Carla Willig (0000-0001-9804-9141), David F Marks (0000-0002-4096-2883, Department of Psychology, City University, UK)
Ano2004
Volume9
Fascículo1
Páginas131-141
Data de publicação2004-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Health Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1359-1053 • E-ISSN: 1461-7277
EditoraSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1359105304036108
PMID14683575
OpenAlexW2028921814
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas12
Referências citadas5

This article is a discourse analysis of ‘The Community Action Programme on Health Promotion, Information, Education and Training 1996–2000’. The analysis uses six stages to discourse analysis. A religious discourse is used to construct the Programme and a military discourse is used to construct its implementation. These discourses are embedded in a scientific discourse. This analysis reveals that despite rhetorical endorsement of the concept of empowerment in health promotion, this Programme disempowers through vagueness, clear hierarchies of power and an emphasis on scientific methods of evaluation. The analysis also reveals that there has been a shift in blame in recent health promotion policy, the reflection is now on the collective as opposed to individual behaviour

Blame · Construct (python library · Critical discourse analysis · Discourse analysis · Empowerment · Health promotion · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Promotion (chess · Public health · Public relations · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · School Health and Nursing Education · Social Psychology