Management through hope
An ethnography of Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7857646 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Irina Papazu (0000-0002-4178-3676, University of Copenhagen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 184-200 |
| Publication date | 2016-07-11 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Organizational Ethnography (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2046-6749 • E-ISSN: 2046-6757 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/joe-11-2015-0025 |
| OpenAlex | W2463255569 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 13 |
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the process of social and technical change that took place between 1997 and 2007 through which Samsø, a rural island of 4,000 inhabitants, became Denmark’s Renewable Energy Island (REI). Design/methodology/approach – Building on ethnographic fieldwork conducted on Samsø in 2013 and 2014, the paper takes as its starting point a citizens’ meeting in which a new renewable energy project is proposed by a municipal coordinator. This meeting, in which the municipal coordinator exhibits a “change management” attitude, fails to win the citizens’ support and becomes an entry point into an investigation of how the REI project developers managed to get the island community to actively support the project. A gateway to the past, the meeting allows the author to ethnographically describe the unobserved events of 1997-2007. Findings – The argument is that the REI project developers practised management through hope or “hope management”, in contrast to “change management”, creating a project that succeeded in accomplishing its goals of changing the island due to its openness, its rootedness in the island community’s past, and the project developers’ ability to speak to a down-to-earth variety of hope. Originality/value – The paper makes use of an ethnographic study of the present to investigate an unobserved past in which a REI was built. Taking up the “hope debate” in anthropology and Science and Technology Studies (Stengers, 2002; Miyazaki, 2004; Jensen, 2014), the paper contributes with an empirical analysis of the role of hope in the management of change processes
Argument (complex analysis · Ethnography · Openness to experience · Originality · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Anthropology · Computer Science · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Democratic Situations
Beyond Autarky
Safe havens for energy democracy? Analysing the low-carbon transitions of Danish energy islands
Storifying Samsø’s Renewable Energy Transition
Rural communities’ energy metabolisms in Portugal
Expanding the scope and implications of energy research
The material politics of solar energy
The challenges of engaging island communities
Rethinking empathy
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2024 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |