Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Contextualising the Irrelevance of “Values” to the Study of International Business

A response

Bibliographic Data

ID7870902
AuthorsM W Sedgwick (0000-0002-9517-3451, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume3
Issue2
Pages191-200
Publication date2014-11-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Business Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2245-4217 • E-ISSN: 2245-4217
PublisherCopenhagen Business School (PUBLISHER • DK)
DOI10.22439/jba.v3i2.4707
OpenAlexW1515465674
LanguageEN
References cited17

At the small gathering at the University of Hong Kong that resulted in many of the papers published in this issue of the JBA, I was paired with Nigel Holden, well-known for his work on cross-cultural management (CCM) in the field of international business (IB). I am an anthropologist with over 20 years of experience researching cross-cultural business contexts. As we did in Hong Kong, here I respond to Nigel's commentary. Specifically, I discuss Hofstede's project and the implications of CCM's emphasis on "values" and "measurement" from an anthropological perspective. I then turn to the state of the field for qualitative research in IB, adding my voice to the growing chorus concerned with the imbalances of quantitative and qualitative methods in that discipline. As an anthropologist, I am naturally flattered by Nigel's suggestion that anthropology take back the "keys to the kingdom" in qualitative IB/CCM research. I, too, welcome the cross-fertilisations so implied, of which the present exercise is an excellent example. That said, I also feel compelled to respond to Nigel's claim that, historically, "anthropology ceded its legitimacy to Hofstede's concept of culture." I outline anthropology's long term, if uneven, interest in business contexts and describe a surge in recent anthropological projects where "modern formal organisations," including businesses, are of central concern

Economics · Political science · Positive economics · Sociology · Global and Cross-Cultural Management · International Business and FDI · International Student and Expatriate Challenges

  • Science in action

    Bruno Latour•Science in action•1987

  • British factory, Japanese factory

    Ronald Philip Dore•British factory, Japanese factory•1990

  • For Harmony and Strength

    Thomas P Rohlen•For Harmony and Strength•1974

  • Mirror, Mirror on the Wall

    Galit Ailon•Academy of Management Review•2008

  • Laboratory Life

    Bruno Latour, Steve WooIgar et al.•Laboratory Life•2013

  • British factory-Japanese factory

    Open Access•Barry Morris, B R Morris•Long Range Planning•1974

  • The Confucius connection

    Open Access•Geert Hofstede, Michael Harris Bond•Organizational Dynamics•1988

  • Ambivalence, anthropology and business

    Open Access•Fiona Moore•Social Anthropology•2011

  • Hofstede's Model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences

    Open Access•Bill Mcsweeney, Brendan McSweeney•Human Relations•2002

  • Globalisation and Japanese Organisational Culture

    Tomoko Hamada Connolly•Social Science Japan Journal•2008

  • The Anthropology of Work in the Fortune 1000

    Open Access•Marietta L Baba•Anthropology of Work Review•1998

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae