Contextualising the Irrelevance of “Values” to the Study of International Business
A response
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7870902 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M W Sedgwick (0000-0002-9517-3451, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 191-200 |
| Publication date | 2014-11-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Business Anthropology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2245-4217 • E-ISSN: 2245-4217 |
| Publisher | Copenhagen Business School (PUBLISHER • DK) |
| DOI | 10.22439/jba.v3i2.4707 |
| OpenAlex | W1515465674 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 17 |
At the small gathering at the University of Hong Kong that resulted in many of the papers published in this issue of the JBA, I was paired with Nigel Holden, well-known for his work on cross-cultural management (CCM) in the field of international business (IB). I am an anthropologist with over 20 years of experience researching cross-cultural business contexts. As we did in Hong Kong, here I respond to Nigel's commentary. Specifically, I discuss Hofstede's project and the implications of CCM's emphasis on "values" and "measurement" from an anthropological perspective. I then turn to the state of the field for qualitative research in IB, adding my voice to the growing chorus concerned with the imbalances of quantitative and qualitative methods in that discipline. As an anthropologist, I am naturally flattered by Nigel's suggestion that anthropology take back the "keys to the kingdom" in qualitative IB/CCM research. I, too, welcome the cross-fertilisations so implied, of which the present exercise is an excellent example. That said, I also feel compelled to respond to Nigel's claim that, historically, "anthropology ceded its legitimacy to Hofstede's concept of culture." I outline anthropology's long term, if uneven, interest in business contexts and describe a surge in recent anthropological projects where "modern formal organisations," including businesses, are of central concern
Economics · Political science · Positive economics · Sociology · Global and Cross-Cultural Management · International Business and FDI · International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Science in action
British factory, Japanese factory
For Harmony and Strength
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall
Laboratory Life
British factory-Japanese factory
The Confucius connection
Ambivalence, anthropology and business
Hofstede's Model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences
Globalisation and Japanese Organisational Culture
The Anthropology of Work in the Fortune 1000
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |