Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Agonism as a State Policy for Engagement of Church in the Project of Europe

The Case of Georgia

Bibliographic Data

ID7874825
AuthorsTamar Gamkrelidze (0000-0003-0086-7387, Maastricht University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume61
Issue2
Pages262-281
Publication date2019-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Church and State (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-969X • E-ISSN: 2040-4867
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/jcs/csy032
OpenAlexW2804289169
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Since the late 1990s, the national elites in Eastern European countries that sought a membership into European institutions have agreed on the political vision of an integration into Europe. Europe has been a symbol for values of liberal democracy. Nevertheless, the concrete political form of liberal democracy and European values has been interpreted differently and has become an issue of debate and even a heated argument among different political groups. In Georgia, the political agenda of joining the European Union (EU) became most effective only after many years of transition, corruption, and social riots between independence in 1991 and the Rose Revolution in 2003. President Mikheil Saakashvili’s policy of integration into the EU and NATO (in the following: “European project”) between 2004 and 2012 reflected the opinion of the majority of Georgians and brought some stability to the country. The European project emerged as an uncontested, sole roadmap for the development of Georgia without alternative. However, this political agenda entailed debates on the relationship between European liberalism and Georgian values. In particular, the Georgian Orthodox Church (GOC) took part in defending what it believed to be Georgian values against European liberalism. Thus, this article looks at the political agendas of the GOC and Saakashvili’s government between 2004 and 2012. In contrast to most of the literature, the paper will argue that the policy of these two strong, social actors was agonistic in the sense put forward by Chantal Mouffe rather than being antagonistic or hostile.

Argument (complex analysis) · Democracy · Economics · European union · Georgian · Independence (probability theory) · Liberalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science) · Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics · Law · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics · Public Administration · Religion and Society Interactions

  • Europe, Russia, or both? Popular perspectives on overlapping regionalism in the Southern Caucasus

    Aron Buzogány•East European Politics•2019

  • The project of Europe

    Tamar Gamkrelidze•East European Politics•2019

Citations per year0.29
Citation span2019 - 2019 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae