Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Veblen’s quadripartite response to the First World War

Bibliographic Data

ID7875682
AuthorsCharles Camic (0000-0001-9848-9657, Northwestern University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume24
Issue4
Pages421-436
Publication date2024-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Classical Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1468-795X • E-ISSN: 1741-2897
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1468795x241279251
OpenAlexW4404426648
LanguageEN
References cited10

Prior to the First World War, Thorstein Veblen wrote extensively about economic theory, formulating the tenets of an evolutionary and institutional economics, and criticizing the static and atomistic premises of classical and marginalist economics, particularly the marginalist theory of distribution, which, in his view, wrongly saw wealth as a reward for productive human labor, rather than a result of the unproductive conduct of parasitic elites. In this period, Veblen devoted relatively little attention to the topics of war and peace. As well, he held that social-scientific inquiry is disinterested: a value-neutral search for knowledge of empirical facts and the theories that explain them. However, during the War, Veblen, while retaining the economic principles of his prewar writings, increasingly combined his emphasis on economics with greater attention to political and cultural factors. Simultaneously, he abandoned his prior insistence on value neutrality to become an activist critic of the War and of Germany’s role in fomenting and perpetuating it. This shift led him to develop: (1) a policy-laced theory of war and peace; (2) practical proposals for building an international organization to promote world peace; (3) specific measures to alleviate wartime food and labor shortages in the U.S.; and (4) a sweeping plan for postwar social “reconstruction.” As Veblen developed these four sets of ideas, he continued his opposition to static and atomistic forms of analysis as well as his commitment to an evolutionary and institutional approach, which saw economic life, along with war and peace, turning on a divide between productive human beings and unproductive parasitic elites

Economics · Epistemology · Neoclassical economics · Positive economics · Social science · Sociology · Veblen good · History of Science and Medicine · Philosophy

  • The Evolution of Institutional Economics

    G M Hodgson•Evolution of Institutional…•2004

  • Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution

    Thorstein Veblen•The Journal of Race Development•1915

  • How Economics Forgot History

    G M Hodgson•How Economics Forgot History•2001

  • Thorstein Veblen

    John Patrick Diggins•Thorstein Veblen•1999

  • A Reply to My Commentators

    J⊘rn Henrik Petersen•History of Political Economy•1991

  • The Instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts

    Thorstein Veblen•Instinct of Workmanship and the…•2017

  • The Place of Science in Modern Civilization

    Thorstein Veblen•American Journal of Sociology•1906

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae