Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Treaty reform in the European Union

The Amsterdam process

Bibliographic Data

ID7880835
AuthorsYouri Devuyst (0000-0002-0985-8789, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume5
Issue4
Pages615-631
Publication date1998-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of European Public Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1350-1763 • E-ISSN: 1466-4429
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13501769880000051
OpenAlexW2016531931
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited6

Amsterdam's Treaty reform was part of an interlocking process of adaptation at several levels of EU decision-making. While Commission and Parliament did contribute to the negotiation's agenda-shaping, the endgame was dominated by the preferences set within the fifteen member states. Rather than focusing on pre-emptive institutional spillover in preparation for enlargement, the Amsterdam negotiation was characterized by a ‘maintaining national control trend’. As Treaty reform must be approved by unanimity, the reluctant governments were able to obtain safeguards allowing them to remain in control either through veto right or via the consolidation of national competences. KEY WORDS : European Unionintergovernmental conferenceTreaty of Amsterdam Additional informationNotes on contributorsYouri DevuystThe views expressed in this article are strictly personal

Economics · European integration · European union · International trade · Political science · Process (computing · Treaty · Computer Science · EU Law and Policy Analysis · European Union Policy and Governance · International Law and Aviation · Law · Public Administration

  • EU External Trade and the Treaty of Lisbon

    Open Access•Arne Niemann•Journal of Contemporary European…•2013

  • Europarty Influence and Its Limits

    Karl Magnus Johansson•Journal of European Integration•2015

  • Confederal consociation and foreign policy

    Stelios Stavridis•Journal of European Integration•2000

  • Party politics in the European Council

    Jonas Tallberg, Karl Magnus Johansson•Journal of European Public Policy•2008

  • Codecision and institutional change

    Henry Farrell, Adrienne Héritier•West European Politics•2007

  • Civic competence and the challenge to EU polity-building

    Dimitris N Chryssochoou•Journal of European Public Policy•2002

  • EU treaty reform as a three-level process

    Gerda Falkner•Journal of European Public Policy•2002

  • Dynamics and Countervailing Pressures of Visa, Asylum and Immigration Policy Treaty Revision

    Open Access•Arne Niemann•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2008

  • Of Gay Rights and Christmas Ornaments

    Open Access•Martijn Mos•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2014

  • The Dynamics of European Integration

    William Wallace•The Dynamics of European…•1992

  • The Maastricht Treaty as High Politics

    Open Access•Michael Baun, Michael J Baun•Political Science Quarterly•1995

  • Decision‐making in the European Union

    John Peterson, Johnathan C Peterson•Journal of European Public Policy•1995

  • Two Faces of Power

    Open Access•Peter Bachrach, Morton S Baratz•American Political Science Review•1962

  • Decisions and Nondecisions

    Open Access•Peter Bachrach, Morton S Baratz•American Political Science Review•1963

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,35
Citation span2000 - 2015 (16)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae