Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

I Don’t Know What to Do with It

Bibliographic Data

ID7890553
AuthorsLauren Bentley (Trinity Western University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume37
Issue1
Pages21-31
Publication date2025-04-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Religion and Popular Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1703-289X • E-ISSN: 1703-289X
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/jrpc.2025.aa103
OpenAlexW4408279723
LanguageEN
References cited7

In season 2, episode 4 of the critically acclaimed British television series Fleabag, the eponymous main character speaks to her best friend, Boo, in a flashback following Fleabag’s mother’s funeral. “I don’t know what to do with it,” Fleabag tells Boo. “All the love I have for her.” Here, Fleabag demonstrates what I refer to as affective excess—an overwhelming emotional response that feels too much for an individual to bear alone. In this case, Fleabag feels too much love for her mother but has no mother to receive it. Boo responds in her typical, guileless way: “I’ll take it. No, I’m serious. It sounds lovely.” The series implies that Fleabag channeled her love for her mother, and the grief accompanying her death, into her relationship with Boo. However, after Boo also dies, the viewer is introduced to one of the show’s central questions: Where can one place their affective excess when the usual channels are no longer available? The show explores how the intersecting demands on Fleabag—as both a feminist and a neoliberal postfeminist agent—leave her without an adequate outlet for unburdening her excess grief and guilt, ultimately rendering healing and relief impossible. Despite her avowed atheism, Fleabag appears to eventually find relief through spiritual means, specifically confession. This article argues that while Fleabag offers a powerful feminist critique of neoliberal society, it also presents an implicit reflection of the limits of feminism and advocates for a transcendent element in human relationships as the only adequate place to unburden affective excess

Gender, Feminism, and Media · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Social Media and Politics

  • Postfeminism and Popular Feminism

    Sarah Banet-Weiser, Sarah Banet‐weiser•Feminist Media Histories•2018

  • Bad Feminism

    Simmons Simmons•Framework The Journal of Cinema…•2020

  • Too Close for Comfort

    Open Access•Fred Woods, Faye Woods•Communication Culture and Critique•2019

  • The moment you realise someone wants your body

    Orlaith Darling•Feminist Media Studies•2020

  • The affective life of heterosexuality

    Open Access•B Holzberg, Aura Lehtonen•Feminist Media Studies•2021

  • Precarious-Girl Comedy

    Rebecca Wanzo•Camera Obscura Feminism Culture…•2016

  • Post-postfeminism

    Rosalind Gill•Feminist Media Studies•2016

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae