Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Phonological contrast and phonetic variation

The case of velars in Iwaidja

Bibliographic Data

ID7900206
AuthorsJason A Shaw (0000-0002-5285-5049), Christopher Carignan (0000-0002-1565-3691), Tonya G Agostini, Robert Mailhammer (0000-0003-0628-9813), Mark Harvey (0000-0001-9901-9921), Donald Derrick (0000-0002-0519-7565)
Year2020
Volume96
Issue3
Pages578-617
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0097-8507 • E-ISSN: 1535-0665
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/lan.2020.0042
OpenAlexW3088280314
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited38

2020, Linguistic Society of America. All rights reserved. A field-based ultrasound and acoustic study of Iwaidja, an endangered Australian Aboriginal language, investigates the phonetic identity of nonnasal velar consonants in intervocalic position, where past work has proposed a [+continuant] vs. [−continuant] phonemic contrast. We analyze the putative contrast within a continuous phonetic space, defined by both acoustic and articulatory parameters, and find gradient variation: from more consonantal realizations, such as [ɰ], to more vocalic realizations, such as [a]. The distribution of realizations across lexical items and speakers does not support the proposed phonemic contrast. This case illustrates how lenition that is both phonetically gradient and variable across speakers and words can give the illusion of a contextu-ally restricted phonemic contrast

Acoustic Phonetics · Contrast (vision · Linguistics · Phonetics · Physics · Speech recognition · Variation (astronomy · Vowel · Artificial Intelligence · Australian Indigenous Culture and History · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology

  • Intervocalic lenition is not phonological

    Open Access•Jonah Katz•Phonology•2021

  • Musical grouping as prosodic implementation

    Open Access•Jonah Katz•Linguistics and Philosophy•2023

  • Extreme stop allophony in Mixtec spontaneous speech

    Open Access•Christian T Dicanio, Christian Dicanio et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2022

  • The inconspicuous substratum

    Open Access•Robert Mailhammer, Stephen Sherwood et al.•English World-Wide A Journal of…•2020

  • The Asymmetrical Stop Inventory of Witzapan Nawat

    Open Access•Hugo Salgado•Journal of the International…•2024

  • Where have all the sound changes gone? Examining the scarcity of evidence for regular sound change in Australian languages

    Luisa Miceli, Erich Round•Linguistics Vanguard•2022

  • The genetic position of Anindilyakwa

    Marie-Elaine van Egmond, Brett Baker•Australian Journal of Linguistics•2020

  • Coarticulation across morpheme boundaries

    Open Access•Petroula Mousikou, Patrycja Strycharczuk et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2021

  • The role of gestural timing in non-coronal fricative mergers in Southwestern Mandarin

    Open Access•Dongmei Rao, Jason A Shaw•Journal of Phonetics•2021

  • The Weckud Wetch of the Wast

    Open Access•Jessica Maye, Richard N Aslin et al.•Cognitive Science•2008

  • Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance

    Lisa Davidson, Lisa S Davidson•The Journal of the Acoustical…•2006

  • The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants

    Open Access•Meghan Sumner, A G Samuel•Journal of Memory and Language•2009

  • Perceptual learning in speech

    Open Access•Dennis Norris•Cognitive Psychology•2003

  • Word Frequency and Age of Acquisition as Determiners of Picture-Naming Latency

    Open Access•John B Carroll, Margaret N White•Quarterly Journal of Experimental…•1973

  • Phonology

    Open Access•Edmund Gussmann•Phonology•2002

  • Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change

    Roger D Woodard, Theo Vennemann•The American Journal of Philology•1989

  • Low vowels and transparency in Kinande vowel harmony

    Open Access•Bryan Gick, Douglas Pulleyblank et al.•Phonology•2006

  • Lenition, perception and neutralisation

    Open Access•Jonah Katz•Phonology•2016

  • Segmental complexity and phonological government

    Open Access•Jonathan Kaye, Jonathan D Kaye et al.•Phonology•1990

  • A Dynamical Approach to Gestural Patterning in Speech Production

    Elliot Saltzman, Elliot L Saltzman et al.•Ecological Psychology•1989

  • The nature of sociolinguistic perception

    Open Access•Kathryn Campbell‐kibler, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler•Language Variation and Change•2009

  • Phonetics and phonology of soft ‘g’ in Turkish

    Open Access•Özlem Ünal-Logacev, Özlem Ünal–Logacev et al.•Journal of the International…•2017

  • Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology

    Open Access•Janet B Pierrehumbert•Language and Speech•2003

  • A Reconstruction of the Proto-Iwaidjan Phoneme System

    Robert Mailhammer, Mark Harvey•Australian Journal of Linguistics•2018

  • Social Influences on the Choice of a Linguistic Variant

    John L Fischer•WORD•1958

  • Variation and the indexical field 1

    Open Access•Penelope Eckert•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2008

  • The variability of syllable patterns in Tashlhiyt Berber and Polish

    Open Access•Anne Hermes, Doris Mücke et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2017

  • Ing

    Kirk Hazen•American Speech•2008

  • Accent, (Ing), and the Social Logic of Listener Perceptions

    Kathryn Campbell-Kibler•American Speech•2007

  • What is lenition

    Open Access•L Bauer•Journal of Linguistics•1988

  • Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception

    Open Access•Natasha Warner, Allard Jongman et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2004

  • Phonological strength and early Germanic syllable structure

    Open Access•Robert W Murray•Lingua•1989

  • Articulatory characteristics of Hungarian 'transparent' vowels

    Open Access•Štefan Beňuš, Adamantios I Gafos et al.•Journal of Phonetics•2007

  • Doubled up all over again

    Open Access•Nicholas Evans•Morphology•2009

  • The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels

    Open Access•D H Whalen, Andrea G Levitt•Journal of Phonetics•1995

  • Sound level protrusions as physical correlates of sonority

    Open Access•Steve Parker•Journal of Phonetics•2008

  • A study on coarticulatory resistance and aggressiveness for front lingual consonants and vowels using ultrasound

    Open Access•Daniel Recasens, Clara Rodríguez•Journal of Phonetics•2016

  • Tone languages and the universality of intrinsic F 0

    Open Access•Bruce Connell•Journal of Phonetics•2002

  • Sounding out Sonority

    Open Access•Steve Parker•Language and Linguistics Compass•2017

  • Imperceptible incomplete neutralization

    Open Access•Aaron Braver•Lingua•2014

  • Tonal alignment is contrastive in falling contours in Dinka

    Open Access•Bert Remijsen•Language•2013

  • Time and Thyme Are not Homophones

    Open Access•Susanne Gahl•Language•2008

  • Informativity and the actuation of lenition

    Open Access•Uriel Cohen Priva•Language•2017

  • Asymmetries in generalizing alternations to and from initial syllables

    Open Access•Michael Becker, Andrew Nevins et al.•Language•2012

  • The causal structure of lenition

    Open Access•Uriel Cohen Priva, Emily Gleason•Language•2020

  • Time and thyme are not homophones

    Open Access•Arne Lohmann•Language•2018

  • The articulation of /ɹ/ in New Zealand English

    Open Access•Matthias Heyne, Xuan Wang et al.•Journal of the International…•2020

Unique citing works9
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2020 - 2024 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae