Intonational Features of Spontaneous Narrations in Monolingual and Heritage Russian in the U.S.—An Exploration of the Rueg Corpus
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7903848 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sabine Zerbian (0000-0002-4631-369X, University of Stuttgart, corresponding author), Yulia Zuban (0009-0009-3033-1760, University of Stuttgart), Maren Klotz (0000-0002-8078-4516, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 2 |
| Publication date | 2023-12-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages9010002 |
| OpenAlex | W4389979941 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 35 |
This article presents RuPro, a new corpus resource of prosodically annotated speech by Russian heritage speakers in the U.S. and monolingually raised Russian speakers. The corpus contains data elicited in formal and informal communicative situations, by male/female and adolescent/adult speakers. The resource is presented with its architecture and annotation, and it is shown how it is used for the analysis of intonational features of spontaneous mono- and bilingual Russian speech. The analyses investigate the length of intonation phrases, types and number of pitch accents, and boundary tones. It emerges that the speaker groups do not differ in the inventory of pitch accents and boundary tones or in the relative frequency of these tonal events. However, they do differ in the length of intonation phrases (IPs), with heritage speakers showing shorter IPs also in the informal communicative situation. Both groups also differ concerning the number of pitch accents used on content words, with heritage speakers using more pitch accents than monolingually raised speakers. The results are discussed with respect to register differentiation and differences in prosodic density across both speaker groups
Annotation · Heritage language · Linguistics · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Heritage Languages and Their Speakers
The Acquisition of Heritage Languages
Intonational Phonology
Heritage languages
Welcome to the Tidyverse
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure
The Intonation of Polar Questions in North American (“Heritage”) Icelandic
Prosody in contact in French
On the universality of intonational phrases
Spoken Corpora of Slavic Languages
Prosodic diversity in Standard Russian
Discourse and Word Order
Do Different Majority Languages Lead to Different Intonational Grammars? A Case Study of Yes/No-Questions in Heritage Russian
Foreign Accent in Adult Simultaneous Bilinguals
American Intonational Interference in Emigre Russian
Sociolectal and Dialectal Variation in Prosody
A Plural Indefinite Article in Heritage Greek
Spanish-English Cross-Linguistic Influence on Heritage Bilinguals' Production of Uptalk
Information status marking in spontaneous vs. read speech in story-telling tasks - Evidence from intonation analysis using GToBI
How prosody signals force and focus-A study of pitch accents in Russian yes-no questions
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |