Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Intonational Features of Spontaneous Narrations in Monolingual and Heritage Russian in the U.S.—An Exploration of the Rueg Corpus

Bibliographic Data

ID7903848
AuthorsSabine Zerbian (0000-0002-4631-369X, University of Stuttgart, corresponding author), Yulia Zuban (0009-0009-3033-1760, University of Stuttgart), Maren Klotz (0000-0002-8078-4516, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin)
Year2023
Volume9
Issue1
Pages2
Publication date2023-12-19
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages9010002
OpenAlexW4389979941
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited35

This article presents RuPro, a new corpus resource of prosodically annotated speech by Russian heritage speakers in the U.S. and monolingually raised Russian speakers. The corpus contains data elicited in formal and informal communicative situations, by male/female and adolescent/adult speakers. The resource is presented with its architecture and annotation, and it is shown how it is used for the analysis of intonational features of spontaneous mono- and bilingual Russian speech. The analyses investigate the length of intonation phrases, types and number of pitch accents, and boundary tones. It emerges that the speaker groups do not differ in the inventory of pitch accents and boundary tones or in the relative frequency of these tonal events. However, they do differ in the length of intonation phrases (IPs), with heritage speakers showing shorter IPs also in the informal communicative situation. Both groups also differ concerning the number of pitch accents used on content words, with heritage speakers using more pitch accents than monolingually raised speakers. The results are discussed with respect to register differentiation and differences in prosodic density across both speaker groups

Annotation · Heritage language · Linguistics · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Left Dislocations in Heritage and Monolingual Russian

    Sabine Zerbian, Kristina Barabashova et al.•Heritage Language Journal•2025

  • Heritage Languages and Their Speakers

    Maria Polinsky•Heritage Languages and Their…•2018

  • The Acquisition of Heritage Languages

    Open Access•Silvina Montrul•Acquisition of Heritage Languages•2015

  • Intonational Phonology

    Open Access•D Robert Ladd•Intonational Phonology•2008

  • Heritage languages

    Suzanne Aalberse, Ad Backus et al.•Heritage Languages•2019

  • Welcome to the Tidyverse

    Open Access•Hadley Wickham, Mara Averick et al.•Journal of Open Source Software•2019

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

  • The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure

    Caroline Fery, Shinichiro Ishihara•Oxford Handbook of Information…•2016

  • The Intonation of Polar Questions in North American (“Heritage”) Icelandic

    Open Access•Nicole Dehé•Journal of Germanic Linguistics•2018

  • Prosody in contact in French

    Open Access•Barbara E Bullock•International Journal of…•2009

  • On the universality of intonational phrases

    Open Access•Nikolaus P Himmelmann, Meytal Sandler et al.•Phonology•2018

  • Spoken Corpora of Slavic Languages

    Open Access•Nina Dobrushina, Elena Sokur•Russian Linguistics•2022

  • Prosodic diversity in Standard Russian

    Open Access•Pavel Duryagin, Sergey Knyazev et al.•Russian Linguistics•2022

  • Discourse and Word Order

    Olga T Yokoyama•Discourse and Word Order…•1987

  • Do Different Majority Languages Lead to Different Intonational Grammars? A Case Study of Yes/No-Questions in Heritage Russian

    Yulia Zuban, Tamara Rathcke et al.•Heritage Language Journal•2023

  • Foreign Accent in Adult Simultaneous Bilinguals

    Tanja Kupisch, Dagmar Barton et al.•Heritage Language Journal•2014

  • American Intonational Interference in Emigre Russian

    David Andrews, David R Andrews•The Slavic and East European…•1993

  • Sociolectal and Dialectal Variation in Prosody

    Open Access•Meghan E Armstrong, Meghan Armstrong et al.•Language and Speech•2022

  • A Plural Indefinite Article in Heritage Greek

    Open Access•Artemis Alexiadou, Vasiliki Rizou et al.•Languages•2022

  • Spanish-English Cross-Linguistic Influence on Heritage Bilinguals' Production of Uptalk

    Open Access•J Y Kim•Languages•2023

  • Information status marking in spontaneous vs. read speech in story-telling tasks - Evidence from intonation analysis using GToBI

    Open Access•Laura E De Ruiter, Laura de Ruiter•Journal of Phonetics•2015

  • How prosody signals force and focus-A study of pitch accents in Russian yes-no questions

    Open Access•Roland Meyer, Roland K Meyer et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2006

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae