Chinese “Dialects” and European “Languages

A Comparison of Lexico-Phonetic and Syntactic Distances

Bibliographic Data

ID7903886
AuthorsChaoju Tang (0009-0001-5181-3322, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China), Vincent J Van Heuven (0000-0003-3631-5699, University of Pannonia), Wilbert Heeringa (0000-0002-5082-9293, Fryske Akademy), Charlotte Gooskens (0000-0002-0958-3682, University of Groningen)
Year2025
Volume10
Issue6
Pages127
Publication date2025-05-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages10060127
OpenAlexW4410868330
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited32

In this article, we tested some specific claims made in the literature on relative distances among European languages and among Chinese dialects, suggesting that some language varieties within the Sinitic family traditionally called dialects are, in fact, more linguistically distant from one another than some European varieties that are traditionally called languages. More generally, we examined whether distances among varieties within and across European language families were larger than those within and across Sinitic language varieties. To this end, we computed lexico-phonetic as well as syntactic distance measures for comparable language materials in six Germanic, five Romance and six Slavic languages, as well as for six Mandarin and nine non-Mandarin (‘southern’) Chinese varieties. Lexico-phonetic distances were expressed as the length-normalized MPI-weighted Levenshtein distances computed on the 100 most frequently used nouns in the 32 language varieties. Syntactic distance was implemented as the (complement of) the Pearson correlation coefficient found for the PoS trigram frequencies established for a parallel corpus of the same four texts translated into each of the 32 languages. The lexico-phonetic distances proved to be relatively large and of approximately equal magnitude in the Germanic, Slavic and non-Mandarin Chinese language varieties. However, the lexico-phonetic distances among the Romance and Mandarin languages were considerably smaller, but of similar magnitude. Cantonese (Guangzhou dialect) was lexico-phonetically as distant from Standard Mandarin (Beijing dialect) as European language pairs such as Portuguese–Italian, Portuguese–Romanian and Dutch–German. Syntactically, however, the differences among the Sinitic varieties were about ten times smaller than the differences among the European languages, both within and across the families—which provides some justification for the Chinese tradition of calling the Sinitic varieties dialects of the same language

Lexico · Lexicon · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Computer Science · Language and cultural evolution · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy · Artificial Intelligence

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access