Policy Influence and Participation in the European Parliament
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7910331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R Scully (0000-0002-8058-7846, corresponding author), Roger M Scully |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 233 |
| Publication date | 1997-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Legislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2307/440384 |
| OpenAlex | W1977011474 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 24 |
| References cited | 11 |
participate more in parliamentary votes. In addition to the impact of other variablesincluding the timing of votes, leadership cues, and the requirement that an absolute majority of members vote at certain stages-EP members are stimulated to participate more in votes on legislation where the EP's influence is greater. The implications of this result for legislative theory, and for our understanding of the EP, are discussed in the conclusion. How important are legislatures to the governing process? In the 25 years since Jean Blondel called for more serious comparative study to answer this question, our understanding has advanced considerably (Blondel 1970). While legislatures are ubiquitous, their influence in the policy process varies greatly across political systems, both in quantity and in type.' A curiosity, however, is that a related and equally basic question remains unanswered. Despite numerous reminders from the new institutionalists that institutions can shape the behavior of political actors, we know almost nothing about whether the policy influence of a legislature affects the behavior of its members. Several studies suggest that legislative influence is positively related to membership retention: members are more likely to remain when they see there is important work to be done (Hibbing and Moore 1991; Shepsle 1988). But the more basic issue, how members of the legislature respond to the institution's policy influence when they are actually there, has been almost entirely neglected.2 This oversight is hardly trivial. A basic task of political science is to understand the motives and behavior of important political actors. Given that influence over policy is one of a legislature's defining characteristics, the response of its membership to the institution's level of policy influence is of fundamental significance. Understanding this response is central to developing an adequate theory of legislative behavior
Parliament · Political science · Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration
Resolving Controversy in the European Union
The Engines of European Integration
Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Participation in Neighbourhood Planning
So far away from me? The effect of geographical distance on representation
The European parliament and the co‐decision procedure
International Relations Theory and European Integration
What Affects the European Parliament’s Legislative Influence? An Analysis of the Success of EP Amendments
Do gender quotas increase legislative voting attendance? The case of the European Parliament
Playing the Co-Decision Game? Rules’ Changes and Institutional Adaptation at the Libe Committee
Abstention in Daylight
Fifty Years on
Competing Principals and Non-Vote Decisions in the European Parliament
MEPs and the building of a ‘parliamentary Europe
Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs
The Party System in the European Parliament
The Power to Delay
When legislators choose not to decide
The policy impact of leadership in committees
Institutionalist Research on the European Union
Institutional constraints, legislative activism and policy change
Toe the line, break the whip
Size, Power, and Electoral Systems
Forum Section
Control of the Commission's Executive Functions
An economic theory of democracy
The Logic of Collective Action
Congress
The voting behaviour of the European Parliament members and the problem of the Europarties
From the Luxembourg compromise to codecision
The Theory of Legislative Institutionalization and the California Assembly
The House Is Not a Home
Legislative Behaviour
Participation's Not a Paradox
Representation and Governance
Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision Making
| Unique citing works | 24 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,83 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2025 (29) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 24 |