Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Policy Influence and Participation in the European Parliament

Bibliographic Data

ID7910331
AuthorsR Scully (0000-0002-8058-7846, corresponding author), Roger M Scully
Year1997
Volume22
Issue2
Pages233
Publication date1997-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/440384
OpenAlexW1977011474
LanguageEN
Citations received24
References cited11

participate more in parliamentary votes. In addition to the impact of other variablesincluding the timing of votes, leadership cues, and the requirement that an absolute majority of members vote at certain stages-EP members are stimulated to participate more in votes on legislation where the EP's influence is greater. The implications of this result for legislative theory, and for our understanding of the EP, are discussed in the conclusion. How important are legislatures to the governing process? In the 25 years since Jean Blondel called for more serious comparative study to answer this question, our understanding has advanced considerably (Blondel 1970). While legislatures are ubiquitous, their influence in the policy process varies greatly across political systems, both in quantity and in type.' A curiosity, however, is that a related and equally basic question remains unanswered. Despite numerous reminders from the new institutionalists that institutions can shape the behavior of political actors, we know almost nothing about whether the policy influence of a legislature affects the behavior of its members. Several studies suggest that legislative influence is positively related to membership retention: members are more likely to remain when they see there is important work to be done (Hibbing and Moore 1991; Shepsle 1988). But the more basic issue, how members of the legislature respond to the institution's policy influence when they are actually there, has been almost entirely neglected.2 This oversight is hardly trivial. A basic task of political science is to understand the motives and behavior of important political actors. Given that influence over policy is one of a legislature's defining characteristics, the response of its membership to the institution's level of policy influence is of fundamental significance. Understanding this response is central to developing an adequate theory of legislative behavior

Parliament · Political science · Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • Resolving Controversy in the European Union

    Open Access•Rob Thomson, Robert Thomson•Resolving Controversy in the…•2011

  • The Engines of European Integration

    Mark A Pollack•ENGINES OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION:…•2003

  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Participation in Neighbourhood Planning

    Greg Brown, Sean Yeong Wei Chin•Planning Practice and Research•2013

  • So far away from me? The effect of geographical distance on representation

    Open Access•David M Willumsen•West European Politics•2019

  • The European parliament and the co‐decision procedure

    R Scully, Roger M Scully•Journal of Legislative Studies•1997

  • International Relations Theory and European Integration

    Open Access•Mark A Pollack•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2001

  • What Affects the European Parliament’s Legislative Influence? An Analysis of the Success of EP Amendments

    Open Access•Amie Kreppel•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•1999

  • Do gender quotas increase legislative voting attendance? The case of the European Parliament

    Mads Dagnis Jensen, Suen Wang•Journal of European Public Policy•2025

  • Playing the Co-Decision Game? Rules’ Changes and Institutional Adaptation at the Libe Committee

    Ariadna Ripoll Servent•Journal of European Integration•2011

  • Abstention in Daylight

    Open Access•Abdul Noury, Abdul G Noury•Public Choice•2004

  • Fifty Years on

    Open Access•Simon Hix, Tapio Raunio et al.•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2003

  • Competing Principals and Non-Vote Decisions in the European Parliament

    Open Access•Nuria Font•Parliamentary Affairs•2020

  • MEPs and the building of a ‘parliamentary Europe

    R Scully, Roger M Scully•Journal of Legislative Studies•1998

  • Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs

    Giacomo Benedetto•Journal of European Public Policy•2005

  • The Party System in the European Parliament

    Open Access•Simon Hix, Amie Kreppel et al.•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2003

  • The Power to Delay

    Open Access•Raya Kardasheva•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2009

  • When legislators choose not to decide

    Open Access•Monika Mühlböck, Nikoleta Yordanova•European Union Politics•2017

  • The policy impact of leadership in committees

    Open Access•R Costello, Rob Thomson•European Union Politics•2010

  • Institutionalist Research on the European Union

    Open Access•Keith Dowding•European Union Politics•2000

  • Institutional constraints, legislative activism and policy change

    Open Access•Manuele Citi, Mogens Kamp Justesen•European Journal of Political…•2016

  • Toe the line, break the whip

    David M Willumsen, Patrik Öhberg•West European Politics•2017

  • Size, Power, and Electoral Systems

    Open Access•Andrew J Taylor•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Forum Section

    Open Access•Bjørn Høyland, Indraneel Sircar et al.•European Union Politics•2009

  • Control of the Commission's Executive Functions

    Open Access•Fabio Franchino•European Union Politics•2000

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • The Logic of Collective Action

    Mancur Olson•Logic of Collective Action•1965

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • The voting behaviour of the European Parliament members and the problem of the Europarties

    Open Access•Fulvio Attinà•European Journal of Political…•1990

  • From the Luxembourg compromise to codecision

    Open Access•Geoffrey Garrett•Electoral Studies•1995

  • The Theory of Legislative Institutionalization and the California Assembly

    Peverill Squire•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • The House Is Not a Home

    Open Access•Bruce E Cain, John Ferejohn et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1979

  • Legislative Behaviour

    Open Access•Jean-Luc Blondel, J Blondel•Government and Opposition•1970

  • Participation's Not a Paradox

    Open Access•Kay Lehman Schlozman, Sidney Verba et al.•British Journal of Political…•1995

  • Representation and Governance

    Open Access•Kenneth A Shepsle•Political Science Quarterly•1988

  • Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision Making

    Open Access•Richard L Hall, Richard Hall•American Political Science Review•1987

Unique citing works24
Citations per year0,83
Citation span1997 - 2025 (29)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 24

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae