Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Natural locations and the distinction between ‘what’ and ‘where’ concepts

Evidence from differential locative marking in Makalero

Bibliographic Data

ID7913288
AuthorsJuliette Huber (University of Regensburg, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume56
Issue3
Pages477-512
Publication date2018-06-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLinguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/ling-2018-0003
OpenAlexW2805207396
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited13

Differential locative marking is found in languages all over the world. Toponyms, in particular, are well known to often require less locative marking than other types of nouns, and it has been suggested that they express ‘where’ concepts. This paper presents a case study of differential locative marking in Makalero, a Papuan language of East Timor, where nouns fall into three categories: those which need no overt locative marking, i.e., can be zero-marked; those which are used with a semantically general locative verb; and those which can only be used with semantically specific locative verbs. Zero-marking of spatial relations occurs only in a specific construction where the nouns in question are used predicatively, suggesting that the syntactic equivalent of the ‘where’ category is a relational expression, not a noun. There is furthermore a certain degree of flexibility in Makalero locative constructions, and alternative expressions result in predictable semantic differences. These differences show that the lack of perceptual boundaries and of an internal structure are important parameters that distinguish the referents of so-called natural location nouns from nouns which denote ‘what’ concepts. More comparative case studies are needed to enrich our understanding of these notions and the properties characterizing them

Linguistics · Locative case · Natural (archaeology) · Noun · Proper noun · Verb · Categorization, perception, and language · Computer Science · History · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Mathematics · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Forests

    Open Access•Niclas Burenhult, Clair Hill et al.•Geographica Helvetica•2017

  • Starting at the end

    Open Access•Laura Lakusta, Barbara Landau•Cognition•2005

  • How Language Structures Space

    Open Access•Léonard Talmy•Spatial Orientation•1983

  • “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition

    Open Access•Barbara Landau, Ray Jackendoff•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1993

  • Landscape in East Timor Papuan

    Juliette Huber•Language Sciences•2014

  • How are nouns categorized as denoting "what" and "where

    Open Access•Konrad Rybka•Language Sciences•2014

  • When "what" is "where

    Open Access•Gabriele H Cablitz•Language Sciences•2008

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,11
Citation span2017 - 2017 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae