Response to Kuokkanen

Bibliographic Data

ID7920045
AuthorsHenrikke Sæthre Ellingsen (0009-0002-1253-9006, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume23
Issue2
Pages384-391
Publication date2024-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMeridians (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1536-6936 • E-ISSN: 1547-8424
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/15366936-11266420
OpenAlexW4403970481
LanguageEN
References cited13

In this response to Rauna Kuokkanen’s (2022) critical reading of Henrikke Sæthre Ellingsen’s (2020) master’s thesis on wind power development in Norway, Ellingsen elaborates on what theoretical terms could have been used in the thesis to better elucidate a systematic pattern in Norwegian politics for the Saami population and illuminate the Fosen case to describe how the Norwegian government handles the knowledge provided by the Indigenous South Saami reindeer herders at Fosen when developing wind power in the latter’s essential winter pastures. The use of the term lack of knowledge helps make the Saami knowledge invisible, so instead, Ellingsen argues, several other theoretical perspectives can highlight the power asymmetry between the Saami community and the Norwegian government

Business · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Peace and Human Rights Education · Political Philosophy and Ethics

Tools

Open DOI