Retracted Article
High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable
Bibliographic Data
Failures to replicate evidence of new discoveries have forced scientists to ask whether this unreliability is due to suboptimal implementation of methods or whether presumptively optimal methods are not, in fact, optimal. This paper reports an investigation by four coordinated laboratories of the prospective replicability of 16 novel experimental findings using rigour-enhancing practices: confirmatory tests, large sample sizes, preregistration and methodological transparency. In contrast to past systematic replication efforts that reported replication rates averaging 50%, replication attempts here produced the expected effects with significance testing ( P
Biology · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Mental Health Research Topics · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology
The Artificial Social Agent Questionnaire (Asaq) — Development and evaluation of a validated instrument for capturing human interaction experiences with artificial social agents
Single paper meta‐analysis is unavoidable
Metachangemaking
On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Research
Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology
Beyond Eyeball Tests
Preregistration and predictivism
Claims about scientific rigour require rigour
The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication
What is replication?
Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
Fixed effects and variance components estimation in three-level meta-analysis
Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”
Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences
Small-Sample Adjustments for Tests of Moderators and Model Fit Using Robust Variance Estimation in Meta-Regression
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
False-Positive Psychology
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described
Many Labs 2
Moderation of classic social psychological effects by demographics in the U.S. adult population
The pipeline project
Many Labs 3
Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |