Reply to Professor Fain
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7932096 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laurent Stern (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1990 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 575 |
| Publication date | 1990-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Literary History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0028-6087 • E-ISSN: 1080-661X |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/469127 |
| OpenAlex | W2323419013 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
O UR DISAGREEMENTS are profound, both about central issues in my paper and matters on its periphery. However, Professor Fain's critical remarks convince me that my views are neither trivial nor uninteresting, and for this I am grateful. Of course he also wants to convince you that my views are mistaken, and I shall try to defend them against this charge. One could argue that words such as narrative and description appear in my paper as technical terms. A book-length account of these matters would have to include a discussion of the relation of
Epistemology · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
| Highly cited | No |
|---|