Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

YES to the Europe I want; NO to this one.” Some Reflections on France's Rejection of the EU Constitution

Bibliographic Data

ID7945890
AuthorsHenry Milner (0000-0002-2261-5829, SUNY Plattsburgh, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume39
Issue2
Pages257-260
Publication date2006-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1049096506060392
OpenAlexW2073689558
LanguageEN
Citations received10

I spent the 2004–2005 academic year in France, culminating with the May 29 th referendum on the European Union constitutional treaty. Fifty-five percent of voters rejected it. Three days later, 62% of Dutch voters followed suit. These were unexpected results, especially in France, a country where 80% declare themselves in favor of European integration. In other member states, a simple rule generally applies: those whose priority is to strengthen the EU are on the “yes” side, while the “no” is identified with those who emphasize national interests. In the Netherlands, though the murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh by an Islamic radical was a factor, the “no” forces won essentially because they persuaded enough people that the direction the Constitution would take the Netherlands went against Dutch interests. To do so, they played on the resentment that Brussels took their money but ignored Dutch concerns—“the same people who fooled you with the euro are fooling you now with this constitution

Constitution · Economic history · Economics · European union · Political science · Politics · Referendum · Resentment · Treaty · European and International Law Studies · European Union Policy and Governance · History · Law

  • Misperceiving Matters

    Open Access•David J Bailey, David Bailey•Comparative European Politics•2008

  • What were the French telling us by voting down the ‘EU constitution’? A case for interpretive research on referendum debates

    Open Access•Claudia Sternberg•Comparative European Politics•2015

  • Blaming the Polish plumber

    Open Access•Dorothy Noyes•Journal of International…•2018

  • Beyond the Pro/Anti-Europe Divide

    Nathan Brack, Olivier Costa•Journal of European Integration•2012

  • Exploring the potential for common European politics

    Steffen Bling, Alexander Gattig•Journal of European Integration•2019

  • First or Second Order Referendums? Understanding the Votes on the EU Constitutional Treaty in Four EU Member States

    Andrew Glencro, Andrew Glencross et al.•West European Politics•2011

  • Macro Salience

    Robert Rohrschneider, Mathew Lovele•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • When Failure isn't Failure

    Open Access•Nicole Scicluna•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2012

  • Puzzling out the EU role in national politics

    Craig Parsons•Journal of European Public Policy•2007

  • The ambiguity of resistance

    Open Access•Andy Storey•Capital & Class•2008

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,53
Citation span2007 - 2019 (13)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae