Variantes de complémentation
Infinitif Complétif / Proposition Complétive À Conjonction Après Les Verbes De Manipulation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7948516 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Esperanza Torrego (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Issue | 102 |
| Pages | 47-56 |
| Publication date | 2016-11-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Pallas (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-0387 • E-ISSN: 2272-7639 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/pallas.3553 |
| OpenAlex | W2561969718 |
| Language | FR |
| References cited | 7 |
The aim of this paper is to find out linguistic factors which explain the variation between Subordinate Clause and Infinitive with manipulative verbs: negative verbs (impedio, prohibeo, deterreo) and positive ones (cogo, iubeo). The hypothesis is that, being a less integrated subordination variant, Subordinate Clauses imply a less strong conceptual integration. The research presented here shows a number of linguistic factors supporting the hypothesis, for instance syntactic negation in the main predicate, non-factual mood, modality attenuators, and modal verbs
Humanities · Linguistics · Proposition · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |