Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fixed‐ versus Variable‐domain Interpretations of Tarski’s Account of Logical Consequence

Bibliographic Data

ID7956940
AuthorsPaolo Mancosu (0000-0002-0165-7931, University of California, Berkeley, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume5
Issue9
Pages745-759
Publication date2010-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy Compass (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00324.x
OpenAlexW1593773959
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited19

In this article I describe and evaluate the debate that surrounds the proper interpretation of Tarski’s account of logical consequence given in his classic 1936 article ‘On the concept of logical consequence’. In the late 1980s Etchemendy argued that the familiar model theoretic account of logical consequence is not to be found in Tarski’s original article. Whereas the contemporary account of logical consequence is a variable‐domain conception – in that it calls for a reinterpretation of the domain of variation of the quantifiers when evaluating logical consequence –, no such reinterpretation is found in Tarski’s original account, which was rather based on a ‘fixed‐domain’ conception. Etchemendy’s claims have sparked a debate on Tarski’s conception of logical consequence with important contributions by, among others, Bach, Bays, Corcoran, Gómez‐Torrente, Mancosu, Ray, Sagüillo, and Sher

Epistemology · Linguistics · Logical conjunction · Logical consequence · Mathematical analysis · Mathematical economics · Reinterpretation · Historical Philosophy and Science · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science

  • First‐order logics over fixed domain

    Open Access•R Gregory Taylor•Theoria•2022

  • Why Is a Valid Inference a Good Inference

    Open Access•Sinan Dogramaci•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2015

  • Uniting model theory and the universalist tradition of logic

    Open Access•Iris Loeb•Synthese•2014

  • Towards transfinite type theory

    Open Access•Iris Loeb•Synthese•2014

  • Carnapian and Tarskian semantics

    Open Access•Pierre Wagner•Synthese•2017

  • Carnap’s early metatheory

    Open Access•Georg Schiemer, Richard Zach et al.•Synthese•2017

  • Logic, semantics, metamathematics

    Alfred Tarski•Logic, semantics, metamathematics•1956

  • Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen

    A Tarski•Logik-Texte•1986

  • Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen

    A Tarski•Logik-Texte Kommentierte Auswahl…•1971

  • The Concept of Logical Consequence

    Bernhard Weiss•Philosophical Studies•1991

  • Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences

    E James Nelson, Everett J Nelson et al.•The Philosophical Review•1942

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2014 - 2022 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae